1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.41.1585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Correlations in Electron-Positron Annihilation: Testing Quantum Chromodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
253
2
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
253
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The C-parameter can actually be considered (in the limit of all particles being massless) as the integral of a more differential observable, the Energy-Energy Correlation (EEC) [5],…”
Section: E + E −mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C-parameter can actually be considered (in the limit of all particles being massless) as the integral of a more differential observable, the Energy-Energy Correlation (EEC) [5],…”
Section: E + E −mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular our hybrid results agree very well with those of Glover and Sutton inside their respective errors (compare KS (5) , KS (6) with GS (4) ). Concerning the phase space slicing method there is a small difference with GS outside the errors (compare KS (7) , KS (8) with GS (3) ). Knowing that the finite parts are still non-negligible at y min = 10 −5 , we can not expect perfect agreement in this case.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NLO Coefficient B(χ) for cos χ = 0 calculation B(cos χ = 0) KN (1) 51.25 ± 2.67 GS (2) 52.39 ± 0.83 GS (3) 51.15 ± 0.68 GS (4) 52.29 ± 2.08 KS (5) 51.96 ± 0.58 KS (6) 51.87 ± 0.58 KS (7) 49.06 ± 0.56 KS (8) 48.92 ± 0.56 …”
Section: Figure Captionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original method used by E R T is also known as the subtraction method. Here, a divergent term is subtracted from the rst term and added to the second, (7) so that the integral is manifestly nite. This method has the advantages of requiring no extra theoretical cuto s and making no approximations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%