Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy conversion efficiency of trout and sea bass production in the Black Sea, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A scale efficient farmer has the same level of technical and pure technical efficiency scores. It can be calculated as below [29,30]:…”
Section: Scale Efficiency (Se)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scale efficient farmer has the same level of technical and pure technical efficiency scores. It can be calculated as below [29,30]:…”
Section: Scale Efficiency (Se)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 4 the biogas productions for different substrates are reported [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Comparing data we can conclude that trout by-products may be considered a most suitable substrate for producing biogas by anaerobic digestion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…To meet future demands for food fish, aquaculture production must increase by 50 million tons by the year 2050 [4]. However, processing raw foods into food products generates byproducts and processing aquatic foods is no exception since it requires removal of bones, skin, head, and viscera (byproducts), which accounts for approximately 60-70 g/ 100 g of the fish weight [5]. Therefore, fish waste management has become one of the procedures having a high impact on the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La revisión de la literatura científica sobre piscicultura ha permitido identificar un importante número de trabajos que utilizan la rentabilidad de la actividad como indicador del efecto económico del factor analizado, entre los que cabe destacar los que la utilizan para analizar: el rendimiento económico de diferentes tipos de alimentación (Urban Jr. y Pruder, 1991;Moñino et al, 2002;Sánchez Lozano et al, 2007;Petersen et al, 2011), la viabilidad económica de la explotación comercial de una especie o producto (Oca et al, 2002;Jeffs y Hooker, 2000;Keys et al, 2004;PootLópez y Gasca-Leyva, 2009;Shamshak y Anderson, 2009;García y García, 2010;Zúñiga, 2010), y el impacto que tienen las condiciones ambientales (Hatch et al, 1998;León et al, 2006;Hernández et al, 2007), el sistema de producción (Losordo y Westerman, 1994;Thongrak et al, 1997;Goode et al, 2002;Lever et al, 2004;Taylor et al, 2006;Liu;Sumaila, 2007y Buck et al, 2010 o la localización de la explotación (Moksness et al, 1998;Gasca-Leyva et al, 2002;Irz y McKenzie, 2003;Bozoglu y Ceyhan, 2009;Miao et al, 2009;Petersen y Phuong, 2010;Huang et al, 2011) sobre el resultado económico del proceso de cultivo.…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified