2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:wine.0000036456.85213.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Consumption of TCP in Ad Hoc Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a well-known result from previous studies that the energy consumption of a WNI can be calculated if the durations the WNI spends in different operating modes are known [3]. On real devices, however, the duration information is not easily accessible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is a well-known result from previous studies that the energy consumption of a WNI can be calculated if the durations the WNI spends in different operating modes are known [3]. On real devices, however, the duration information is not easily accessible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [13] investigated the effects of RTC/CTS access mode in ad-hoc scenarios, while [14] analyzed the power consumption of MAC/PHY layer overheads and extended the study to low-energy transmit power control and physical layer rate adaptation. Concerning the physical operating modes of WNIs, the study in [3] analyzed the power consumption of a TCP sender by dividing the transmission process into three states, namely, idle, transmitting and receiving. Derived from [3], our power model takes the 802.11 power saving modes into account and divides the transmission process into four states, namely, IDLE, SLEEP, TRANSMIT, and RECEIVE.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Singh et al [21] measured the energy consumption of the variants of TCP (i.e., Reno, Newreno, SACK, and ECN-ELFN) in ad-hoc networks, and showed that ECN-EFLN has a lower energy cost than the others. These studies also show that since TCP employs a complicated mechanism for congestion control and error recovery, modeling its exact energy consumption remains an open problem.…”
Section: An Energy Consumption Framework For Distributed Java-based Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers have attempted to characterize the energy consumption of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) [21,27]. Singh et al [21] measured the energy consumption of the variants of TCP (i.e., Reno, Newreno, SACK, and ECN-ELFN) in ad-hoc networks, and showed that ECN-EFLN has a lower energy cost than the others.…”
Section: An Energy Consumption Framework For Distributed Java-based Smentioning
confidence: 99%