2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy consumption and economic growth revisited in African countries

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
89
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
8
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the discussion on the international literature's findings, the fact that the studies' conclusions for the South African case vary is not surprising. For example, Al-mulali and Sab (2012) and Eggoh et al (2011) confirm that energy consumption causes economic growth, while Esso (2010) concluded exactly the opposite. Interestingly, Kahsai et al(2012) found that there is not relationship in the short-run (neutrality hypothesis) but a bidirectional causality exists in the long-run (feedback hypothesis).…”
Section: ) Feedback Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the discussion on the international literature's findings, the fact that the studies' conclusions for the South African case vary is not surprising. For example, Al-mulali and Sab (2012) and Eggoh et al (2011) confirm that energy consumption causes economic growth, while Esso (2010) concluded exactly the opposite. Interestingly, Kahsai et al(2012) found that there is not relationship in the short-run (neutrality hypothesis) but a bidirectional causality exists in the long-run (feedback hypothesis).…”
Section: ) Feedback Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Balcilar et al (2010) also argues that the reason behind the variability is partially the sample periods covered, especially for studies that include the 1980s, due to the relatively small data span and secondly because of the structural or regime changes. These structural breaks when omitted can lead to misspecifications and false results (Eggoh et al, 2011).…”
Section: ) Feedback Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, policy measures directed at energy consumption and economic growth would suffice to impact the broader economy. An energy growth nexus for 21 African countries for the period 1970-2006, using panel cointegration and causality, was concluded (Eggoh, Bangake & Rault 2011). Results concluded that an increase or decrease of energy consumption lead to an increase or decrease of economic growth; similarly, when economic growth does likewise, electricity consumption will react as such; hence, the relationship is bidirectional.…”
Section: Economic Growth F Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dolayısıyla enerji tüketimi-büyüme ilişkisinin üzerine ampirik literatürde karışık sonuçlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Yu and Choi (1985), Ferguson (2000), Toman and Jemelkova (2003) enerji tüketimi-büyüme ilişkisi üzerine çalışmalarıyla katkıda bulunmuşlar ve bazı noktalara işaret etmişlerdir: Enerji tüketimi ve büyüme arasındaki ilişki hakkında net bir fikir birliği olmamaktadır. Bunun nedeni bir ülke içindeki iklim koşulları, değişik enerji tüketimi kalıpları, enerji tüketiminin yapısı ve ekonomik gelişme aşamaları gibi heterojen faktörlerden kaynaklanır.…”
Section: Literatür Taraması Ve Dünyada Bazı üLkelerde Enerji Tüketimiunclassified