Energy Conservation More Effective With Rebound Policy

Abstract

This article sketches the problem of indirect energy use effects, also known as rebound, of energy conservation. There is widespread support for energy conservation, especially when it is voluntary, as this seems a cheap way to realize environmental and energy-climate goals. However, this overlooks the phenomenon of rebound. The topic of energy rebound has mainly attracted attention from energy analysts, but has been surprisingly neglected in environmental economics, even though economists generally are concerned with indirect or economy-wide impacts of technical change and policies. This paper presents definitions and interpretations of energy and environmental rebound, as well as four fundamental reasons for the existence of the rebound phenomenon. It further offers the most complete list of rebound pathways or mechanisms available in the literature. In addition, it discusses empirical estimates of rebound and addresses the implications of uncertainties and difficulties in assessing rebound. Suggestions are offered for strategies and public policies to contain rebound. It is advised that rebound evaluation is an essential part of environmental policy and project assessments. As opposed to earlier studies, this paper stresses the relevance of the distinction between energy conservation resulting from autonomous demand

What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability

“…There is always pressure for sustainable path-breaking innovations to become competitive on the more narrow economic, technological, organisational and other criteria of existing markets, compared to the broader sustainability values that might originally have motivated the innovative effort, but which remain externalities in conventional markets. Moreover, even if cost reductions are realised while maintaining sustainability performance improvements, rebound effects and economic growth can counteract these performance improvements in the long run (van den Bergh, 2011;Jackson, 2009). …”

Economic structure and energy savings from energy efficiency in households

“…Furthermore, some authors argue that the embodied energy of the additional goods and services consumed constitutes an additional component of the indirect 2 The income effect relates to the change in the demand for a product (good or service) due to a change in the consumers' real income, while the substitution effect describes the change in demand due to a change in the relative price (relative to other products), controlling for the change in real income. 6 effect, in the form of the so-called "embodied energy" effect (Sorrell, 2007;van den Bergh, 2011).…”

A brighter future? Quantifying the rebound effect in energy efficient lighting

“…For overviews and taxonomies of rebound effects see Greening et al (2000), Sorrell (2007), Madlener and Alcott (2009), van den Bergh (2011) or Turner (2013.…”