2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2010.5495742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy concentration enhancement using window width optimization in S transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FFT-based implementations of the proposed ASTFT are also introduced. Simulation results show that our method outperforms the CM-based ASTFT [16] and the chirp-ratebased ASTFT [13] in both noiseless and noisy environments. For IF estimation based on TFRs, it is shown that our method is superior to many other adaptive TFRs at low signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) but inferior to the adaptive bilinear TFRs at high SNR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FFT-based implementations of the proposed ASTFT are also introduced. Simulation results show that our method outperforms the CM-based ASTFT [16] and the chirp-ratebased ASTFT [13] in both noiseless and noisy environments. For IF estimation based on TFRs, it is shown that our method is superior to many other adaptive TFRs at low signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) but inferior to the adaptive bilinear TFRs at high SNR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the main disadvantage of the CM approach is the very high computational complexity. The CM approach has been used in various TFRs such as the STFT [23], the Stransform [15], [16], the S-method (SM) [24], and the SPWVD [22]. For each TF point, the reassignment methods calculate the center of gravity of the signal energy around this TF point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When higher spectral resolution is needed for the spectral components (i.e., 's) of interest, column-wise circular convolution between and are performed. Denoting as the computed using , is expressed with the -point row-wise FFT for each of interests as (13) The relationship between and is found as (14) The performance of the No-method and the proposed forward STFT enhancement technique is briefly compared in Fig. 5.…”
Section: A Proposed Forward Stft Enhancement Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adjust the time-frequency resolution appropriately to time-varying signals, a number of adaptive STFT (ASTFT) techniques have been introduced in the literature [8]- [11], most of which can be classified into two groups; one is the concentration measure (CM)-based, and the other is chirp-rate (CR)-based [7]. In the CM-based ASTFT, the effects of certain parameter variations on the energy concentration of the input signal is examined in the time-frequency domain to find the optimum parameter value, yielding the highest energy concentration, which is used to perform STFT [12], [13]. Therefore, the CM-based ASTFT can produce useful results, however, the process to find the optimum parameter value is computationally expensive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13]- [14], this has been performed through the introduction and the optimal selection of an extra parameter in the standard Stransform relation. The methods proposed in [15]- [16] are based on optimal selection of Gaussian window parameters, considering a concentration measure. Since hyperbolic window has three parameters which define its shape in addition to its width, the optimal selection of hyperbolic window parameters is trickier in comparison to a Gaussian window which has only one parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%