2011
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182324306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Based Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy

Abstract: This review suggests that energy-based vessel sealing devices may decrease operating time, blood loss, and hospital stay. There was no difference in complication rate and no studies investigated mortality or quality of life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some RF-based devices provide electrical current to the vessel followed by an actuated mechanical knife which separates the coagulum into two sealed segments. These devices expedite normally labor-intensive surgical procedures such as lobectomy, 1,2 nephrectomy, 3 gastric bypass, 4-6 splenectomy, 7,8 thyroidectomy, [9][10][11][12][13][14] hysterectomy, 15 and colectomy. [16][17][18][19] However, both electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices have limitations, including the potential for undesirable charring and unnecessarily large collateral thermal damage zones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some RF-based devices provide electrical current to the vessel followed by an actuated mechanical knife which separates the coagulum into two sealed segments. These devices expedite normally labor-intensive surgical procedures such as lobectomy, 1,2 nephrectomy, 3 gastric bypass, 4-6 splenectomy, 7,8 thyroidectomy, [9][10][11][12][13][14] hysterectomy, 15 and colectomy. [16][17][18][19] However, both electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices have limitations, including the potential for undesirable charring and unnecessarily large collateral thermal damage zones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have found a small improvement in postoperative pain with the use of the Ligasure™ device compared with conventional suturing, these studies were small and had methodological limitations 3. It is unclear whether the small difference found in postoperative pain on the evening of surgery in this study is clinically significant.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The study utilised adequate allocation concealment and blinded both patients and outcome assessors. Unfortunately, however, the study was relatively small and, as with many previous studies,3 probably underpowered to demonstrate significant differences in most of their predefined outcomes. The follow-up time of 6 months and the loss to follow-up also limited the findings with respect to quality of life and micturition symptoms.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Accordingly, a few authors suggested the use of advanced electrosurgical instruments that provide the ability to rapidly and sequentially seal vessels and coagulate and transect pedicles with a tool manipulated by one hand. Previous studies showed such instruments adapted to vaginal surgery from laparoscopic practice were suitable alternatives to conventional suturing techniques and had similar safety profiles [7,12,13]. To our knowledge, no studies have yet compared the surgery-related outcomes of EBVS system and conventional suture ligation technique only focusing on the morbidly obese patients undergoing VH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%