2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-Based Method for Providing Soil Surface Erodibility Rankings

Abstract: The jet erosion test (JET) and the hole erosion test (HET) are two tests used to determine soil erodibility classification, and results are commonly interpreted by two distinct methods. A new method based on fluid energy dissipation and on measurement of the eroded mass for interpreting the two tests is proposed. Different fine-grained soils, covering a large range of erodibility, are tested. It is shown that, by using common methods, the erosion coefficient and average critical shear stress are different with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow in the JET is at steady state; hence, the effect of gravity on soil particles is negligible. Marot et al (2011) made a similar assumption in their JET and HET study. This assumption is only applicable in cohesive soils where particles are transported in suspension at the same speed as the eroding fluid.…”
Section: Development Of Semi-physically Based Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Flow in the JET is at steady state; hence, the effect of gravity on soil particles is negligible. Marot et al (2011) made a similar assumption in their JET and HET study. This assumption is only applicable in cohesive soils where particles are transported in suspension at the same speed as the eroding fluid.…”
Section: Development Of Semi-physically Based Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Such approach was first proposed to interpret results from jet erosion tests and hole erosion tests by Marot et al [15] and then adapted to suffusion [16]. The expression of the fluid flow power deduced from the energy conservation equation for the fluid phase involves four assumptions according to Marot et al [15,16]: (1) The fluid temperature is constant, (2) the system is adiabatic, (3) a steady-state flow is considered, and (4) as the value of Reynolds number is indicating a laminar flow [16], it is assumed that energy is mainly dissipated by viscous shear at the direct vicinity of solid particles and is thus representative of solid-fluid interactions [25]. Thanks to these assumptions, the flow power P flow expended by the fluid to seep through a homogeneous soil volume can be expressed by:…”
Section: Description Of the Eroded Mass For The First Erosion Phasementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thanks to this modelling of porous media, the hydraulic shear stress along the horizontal capillary tube system can be expressed in terms of pressure gradient, porosity and intrinsic permeability of the soil. Another approach, which does not need any assumption regarding the granular matter fabric, was developed to interpret results from the jet erosion tests (JET) and the hole erosion tests (HET), and it is based on the power expended by the seepage flow [15,16]. In such approach, changes of hydraulic soil characteristics are implicitly taken into account through the flow power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the energy approach of Marot and coworkers and also by the thermodynamic implication (Equation ), we suggest the following local suffusion law: ρfalsêF=kαkFρFg∇pF−ρFg2=kα0.25emPseepage where kα=10−Iα is the coefficient of erodibility of the material, which is an intrinsic property, k F is the hydraulic conductivity, and g is the vertical component of the gravity vector. The right‐hand side term of Equation is in fact the product between k α and the volumetric power dissipated by the flow P seepage . The erosion resistance index I α was found to be independent of the hydraulic loading and of the sample's size upon several laboratory scale studies …”
Section: A Case Study For Soil Suffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%