2016 IEEE Annual India Conference (INDICON) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/indicon.2016.7838879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-based Bayesian spectrum sensing over α-η-μ fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detector is defined using the Bayesian approach [27,48], which combines the probabilities of the two wrong decisions P F A and P M D through using the a priori probability p(H 0 ) of having a spectrum free from PU transmissions and the threshold value. This work is further extended in [43] which considers a generalized fading model termed α − κ − µ, which fits experimental measurements well. The study in [44] allows for Nakagami fading, Gaussian noise and shadowing, while the received signal follows a Gamma distribution because the detector works for very few signal samples (such that cannot be assumed to have Gaussian distribution).…”
Section: Energy Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detector is defined using the Bayesian approach [27,48], which combines the probabilities of the two wrong decisions P F A and P M D through using the a priori probability p(H 0 ) of having a spectrum free from PU transmissions and the threshold value. This work is further extended in [43] which considers a generalized fading model termed α − κ − µ, which fits experimental measurements well. The study in [44] allows for Nakagami fading, Gaussian noise and shadowing, while the received signal follows a Gamma distribution because the detector works for very few signal samples (such that cannot be assumed to have Gaussian distribution).…”
Section: Energy Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Proposed modifications are related to the dynamic readjustment of the decision threshold, the comparison of its performance with other sensing methods, the received signal's decomposition into its frequency components, finding the optimal sensing time against the a priori probability of the spectrum being available p(H 0 ). Studies such as those presented in [33,[41][42][43][44][45][46] introduce an important dimension to the design of ED, namely, they add more realistic propagation conditions to the detector's analytical model. The method proposed in [33] identifies the PU signal under Rayleigh fading and unknown variance of the Gaussian-distributed noise, and in addition to the probability of detection, the spectrum utilization coefficient 2 is evaluated.…”
Section: Energy Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%