2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2017.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-aware SRPT server with batch arrivals: Analysis and optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under more general assumptions with general service and setup times, they computed the two mean values [R] and [E] by means of some queueing insensitivity, and then discussed the optimality of the ERP and ERWS. Further, Gebrehiwot et al [16,17] generalized the FCFS queueing results of the data center with multiple intermediate sleep states to the processor-sharing discipline and the shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) discipline, respectively. Different from the ERP and ERWS, Mitrani [35,36] considered a data center of N identical servers whose first part contains m servers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under more general assumptions with general service and setup times, they computed the two mean values [R] and [E] by means of some queueing insensitivity, and then discussed the optimality of the ERP and ERWS. Further, Gebrehiwot et al [16,17] generalized the FCFS queueing results of the data center with multiple intermediate sleep states to the processor-sharing discipline and the shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) discipline, respectively. Different from the ERP and ERWS, Mitrani [35,36] considered a data center of N identical servers whose first part contains m servers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark: Note that the regenerative cycle definition is identical with our earlier papers [7,6,8]. However, without any major modifications to the analysis the regeneration point could also be selected as the point where the queue empties.…”
Section: We Denote By E[t ] the Overall Mean Delay Of The Jobs And Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy-aware queueing models have been recently developed in order to study the performance-energy tradeoff inherent in modern data servers supporting sleep states. The considered queueing models are typically variations of the single-server M/G/1 queue with a setup delay, where the setup delay reflects the delay penalty from waking up a server once it has been put to sleep to save energy, see [3,6,7,8,10]. Also, multisever variants of the models have been studied, see [2,3,4,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [7], such servers were called InstantOff servers, while the ordinary ones were referred to as NeverOff servers. In [23,10,9,11], it was shown, under various assumptions, that the optimal sleep state control policy for a single server is either InstantOff or NeverOff. The FPI approach has been applied also for the dispatching problem in the context of such energy-aware InstantOff servers, see, e.g., [18,17,16,12,19,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%