2016 IEEE NetSoft Conference and Workshops (NetSoft) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/netsoft.2016.7502446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy aware routing and traffic management for software defined networks

Abstract: Abstract-Since traffic diversity and volume increase with growing popularity of mobile applications, there is the strong need to manage the traffic carried by networks. Software defined networks can simplify network management while enabling new services by employing traffic management including routing whose goal is to maximize the given utility while satisfying capacity requirements. In this paper, we propose an efficient routing algorithm to minimize the cost based on power consumption determined by the num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power consumption is calculated by taking into account both switch and port usage in total. According to the power consumption results given in Figure 6, the proposed joint routing and resource allocation in SDMN saves the power between 20W and 100W compared to the proposed routing with only SDN in [6] for all network topologies. Moreover, the power consumption the first network topology is less than the first Waxman topology since the number of OpenFlow swicthes in the first network topology are low.…”
Section: Fig 2: First Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The power consumption is calculated by taking into account both switch and port usage in total. According to the power consumption results given in Figure 6, the proposed joint routing and resource allocation in SDMN saves the power between 20W and 100W compared to the proposed routing with only SDN in [6] for all network topologies. Moreover, the power consumption the first network topology is less than the first Waxman topology since the number of OpenFlow swicthes in the first network topology are low.…”
Section: Fig 2: First Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed joint routing and resource allocation in SDMN achieves better performances for all types of network topologies compared to the proposed routing with only SDN in [6] which examined the energy efficient routing algorithm by decreasing the number of active switches while satisfying only throughput constraints without C-RAN. The power consumption is calculated by taking into account both switch and port usage in total.…”
Section: Fig 2: First Network Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some recent works [17,18,19,20] consider the problem of optimizing the power consumption in SDN using an energy-aware tra c engineering approach that minimizes the number of links. They present formulation of the optimization problem involving routing requirements for control and data plane communications.…”
Section: Energy-aware Routing With Software Defined Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study, Wang et al developed a low‐complexity greedy algorithm to route flows by aggregating them over the least number of links while considering packet delay and link utilization constraints. Özbek et al presented a greedy routing algorithm to minimize the network power consumption by switching off inactive devices, while provisioning traffic demands. Similarly, in another study, Markiewicz et al presented a heuristic method with 4 different strategies to switch on the minimum number of network devices and links, such that traffic is routed and network power consumption is minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%