2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and exergy analysis of solar stills with micro/nano particles: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They compared productivity of the modified plant with traditional plant and found productivity enhanced by 41.18% and 32.35% with graphite and copper oxide. Exergy efficiency and cost of water production of the modified solar still plant were also confirmed better than traditional plant [26]. Some important outputs related to various solar still plants are also discussed as; Kabeel [27] found 4.0 L/m 2 /day water with concave wick basin pyramidal shaped solar still, Wassouf et al [28] achieved 1.8 L/m 2 /day water with pyramidal and triangular prism shaped solar still.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They compared productivity of the modified plant with traditional plant and found productivity enhanced by 41.18% and 32.35% with graphite and copper oxide. Exergy efficiency and cost of water production of the modified solar still plant were also confirmed better than traditional plant [26]. Some important outputs related to various solar still plants are also discussed as; Kabeel [27] found 4.0 L/m 2 /day water with concave wick basin pyramidal shaped solar still, Wassouf et al [28] achieved 1.8 L/m 2 /day water with pyramidal and triangular prism shaped solar still.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Latitude and Longitude of this location are 22° 43′ 4.51″ N and 75° 49′ 59.88″ E respectively. After finding the different temperatures and quantities of distilled water, the thermal efficiencies [1][2][3][4] and exergy efficiencies [22][23][24][25][26] have been found in different climatic conditions by adopting the following methodology. First, the thermal efficiency can be defined as the ratio of the amount of heat that is absorbed by water which is present in the basin of the solar still to the solar energy or solar radiation which is received by the rooftop i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Adding nanoparticles (1-100 nm) into a base fluid in heating and cooling processes is one of the methods to increase the overall heat transfer coefficient between the fluid and the surrounding surfaces [4][5][6]. The main reason of this phenomenon is the significant increasing of the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid (with nanoparticles) compared with the base fluid (without nanoparticles) [7][8][9][10][11]. Effects of different parameters, such as temperature, volume fraction, particle shape and particle size) on the thermal conductivity ratio (TCR) of the nanofluid and that of its base fluid studied in many articles [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%