Abstract:Building more air-tight dwellings is having a deleterious impact on indoor air quality. In a range of recently completed dwellings CO2 concentrations were measured in occupied bedrooms at unacceptable concentrations (occupied mean peak of 2317ppm and a time weighted average of 1834ppm range 480 -4800ppm). Such high levels confirm that air tight dwellings with only trickle ventilators as the 'planned' ventilation strategy do not meet the standards demanded by the Building Regulations. Reducing ventilation rates to improve energy efficiency and lower carbon emissions, without providing a planned and effective ventilation strategy is likely to result in a more toxic and hazardous indoor environment, with concurrent and significant negative long term and insidious impacts on public health. Furthermore, the methodology underpinning the current regulations cannot be considered as creditable. Any researchers operating in this field require to recognise that dwellings have internal doors. (6) and Crump et al (7) , who called for further investigations to ascertain 'healthy' ventilation rates. This was partially addressed in a recent study (8) commissioned by the Scottish Government, "The effect that increasing air-tightness may have on air quality within dwellings". In this study air tightness and air change rates were measured in a mid-terrace dwelling (Garston, Watford) under a variety of conditions and the published report concluded that dwellings built to 5m 3 /m 2/ /hr@50Pa provide air change rates roughly in line with the CIBSE (9) recommendation of 8l/s per person.
BRE test results
2.1In a mid-terrace dwelling, with an air tightness reduced to 6m 3/ /m 2 /hr@50Pa with standard trickle vents fitted on all windows, ventilation rates were measured at 0.7 to 1.3ach -1 on the upper floor (equating to 37-69 l/s), and 0.4 to 0.6 ach -1 on the ground floor (equating to 21-32 l/s). Measurements of CO 2 concentrations (released from a mechanical source) did not provide any cause for concern and settled at circa 1000ppm in the living room and 600ppm in bedrooms.
2.2
3.2The living room and double bedroom were repeatedly pressure tested with the MHVR system outlets/inlets sealed and the system disconnected from the power supply. By progressively increasing the opening area of an additional vent in the tarpaulin, the target air leakage/infiltration rate of 5m 3 /m 2 /hr@50 Pa was achieved. The rooms were then re-occupied Four data sets were collected over two 24hours occupied periods. The initial set measured CO 2 , temperature and humidity -with the MHRV system disabled -between 1800-2200hrs in the living room and 2300-0700hrs in the master bedroom The second two data sets measured the same parameters with the MHRV system re-activated.
ResultsGraph 1:Living room MHRV disabled Graph 2: Bedroom MHRV disabled 4. Discussion 4.1 When the living room door is closed and the room occupied by 2 adults and 3 children, CO 2 levels climbed at a rate of 514ppm/hour, peaking at just over 2600ppm. At this time the children star...