2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy absorption characteristics of metallic triply periodic minimal surface sheet structures under compressive loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

14
163
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
163
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Melancon et al also calculated an increase, to a lesser degree, of 7% to 9% in diagonal and horizontal struts, respectively. Similar observations on strut orientation dependency are also observed in references [60,[65][66][67].…”
Section: Dimensional Inaccuraciessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Melancon et al also calculated an increase, to a lesser degree, of 7% to 9% in diagonal and horizontal struts, respectively. Similar observations on strut orientation dependency are also observed in references [60,[65][66][67].…”
Section: Dimensional Inaccuraciessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Cuadrado et al [63] linked deviations in strut diameter to the overall volume fraction of lattice structures, observing a volume fraction less than designed in lattice structures consisting of a significant portion of vertical struts, with the opposite occurring in designs with more horizontal struts. Zhang et al observed similar orientation-dependent thickness variations in sheet TPMS unit cells (primitive, diamond, gyroid) [60]. [18]), b incomplete fusion [52], c severe cracking causing delamination [53], d balling occurring at higher scanning speeds [54] and e spatter [55] Melancon et al [42] and Liu et al [64] observed deviations in the position of struts' axes, defining this deviation as 'strut waviness' (Fig.…”
Section: Dimensional Inaccuraciesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy absorption capability of progressively failing glassy carbon nanospinodals substantially exceeds that of any other 3D architected material (Figure d). We measure 3–20 times increased specific energy absorption compared to the most advanced nanolattices, as well as larger‐scale beam‐, and shell‐based architected materials . Compared to metal foams, our nanospinodals show up to an order of magnitude increase in energy absorption capability .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…c) Energy absorption versus relative density. d) Comparison of the energy absorption with metallic foams, nanolattices, large‐scale beam‐, and shell‐based lattices …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%