1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(97)00048-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-absorption abilities of CFRP cylinders during impact crushing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different modes of crushing have been identified, such as splaying and fragmentation modes [20]. The crushing modes and consequently the specific energy absorption are dependent on multiple parameters such as the tube geometry [28][29][30][31][32], fiber type [33,34] and architecture [31,32], matrix resin [35], testing speed [32,36,37], temperature [38], trigger [39,40] and surface treatment [41]. Recently, Mahdi and Sebaey [42] have reported that radial reinforcements improve crashworthiness capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different modes of crushing have been identified, such as splaying and fragmentation modes [20]. The crushing modes and consequently the specific energy absorption are dependent on multiple parameters such as the tube geometry [28][29][30][31][32], fiber type [33,34] and architecture [31,32], matrix resin [35], testing speed [32,36,37], temperature [38], trigger [39,40] and surface treatment [41]. Recently, Mahdi and Sebaey [42] have reported that radial reinforcements improve crashworthiness capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When energy-absorbing devices are considered, there are three classification groups; each one relies either on material deformation, extrusion or friction [3]. The impacting of cylindrical tubes can normally be evaluated in many ways ranging from quasi-static testing [4], dynamic testing [5] and impact testing [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proved that the Mg alloy sandwich has ultra-light weight as well as better specific strength and rigidity than that of aluminum alloy. One of the main drawbacks of sandwich structure is its low resistance to impact damage and the extent to which the strength of the structure is reduced under compressive loading [5,6]. At present, the energy absorption properties under impact as well as the vibration response of magnesium alloy honeycomb sandwich are still open to designers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%