2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(99)00690-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetics of X-ray-amorphous zirconia and the role of surface energy in its formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
33
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon was in agreement with a previous report on the electron beam sensitivity of amorphous zirconia, with nanoparticles growing to approximately 5.4 nm in diameter after electron irradiation, and diffraction rings developing in the SAED patterns. 25 phenomenon was observed with the time varying EDS experiment. As-deposited coating composition was slightly oxygen deficient with respect to the ZrO 2 stoichiometry, as was measured by using XPS.…”
Section: B In Situ Tem Studies Of Ysz-au Composite Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This phenomenon was in agreement with a previous report on the electron beam sensitivity of amorphous zirconia, with nanoparticles growing to approximately 5.4 nm in diameter after electron irradiation, and diffraction rings developing in the SAED patterns. 25 phenomenon was observed with the time varying EDS experiment. As-deposited coating composition was slightly oxygen deficient with respect to the ZrO 2 stoichiometry, as was measured by using XPS.…”
Section: B In Situ Tem Studies Of Ysz-au Composite Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…[4] The tendency of very thin films not to form the tetragonal phase may be explained by the surface energy stabilisation of amorphous relative to tetragonal zirconia. [54] Some of the experiments (specifically, measurements of isobars by XPS) were performed with the thin and thus only partially crystallised samples, and the interpretation of these experiments must consider the small tetragonal fraction of the films. The size of the tetragonal crystallites is equivalent to those of active sulfated zirconia powders.…”
Section: Validation Of Thin Films As Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for measured heats of reaction, neither the initial nor the final state is usually exactly defined in a thermodynamic sense with known composition, fraction of crystalline material, and particle or crystallite size. Molodetsky et al [47] have tried to distinguish surface area from crystallization effects. They report an increase in surface energy for the transition from amorphous to tetragonal zirconia, specifically 14.6 kJ·mol -1 for a material with 100 m 2 ·g -1 surface area, and an enthalpy of crystallization of tetragonal zirconia of -53 kJ·mol -1 .…”
Section: Events During Thermal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%