2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.115424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetics of interlayer binding in graphite: The semiempirical approach revisited

Abstract: We have developed a semiempirical method to obtain interlayer binding energy of graphite in the previous work ͓M. Hasegawa and K. Nishidate, Phys. Rev. B 70, 205431 ͑2004͔͒. In the present paper, we revisit this approach and develop an improved method, in which ab initio calculations based on the density functional theory ͑DFT͒ are also corrected through an empirical atom-atom van der Waals ͑vdW͒ interaction. The local density approximation ͑LDA͒ and generalized gradient approximation ͑GGA͒ are used in the DFT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
10
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value compares well with those reported from experiments, namely, 43, 57 35, 58 and 52 meV/atom, 59 whereas other theoretical calculations range typically between 20 and 60 meV/atom. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66] It is noteworthy that theoretical values as low as an order of magnitude smaller or as high as 170 meV/ atom have also been reported. For a single hydrocarbon molecule, here C 12 on graphite, the model-predicted adsorption energy at T ) 0 K is 1.3 eV in vacuum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value compares well with those reported from experiments, namely, 43, 57 35, 58 and 52 meV/atom, 59 whereas other theoretical calculations range typically between 20 and 60 meV/atom. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66] It is noteworthy that theoretical values as low as an order of magnitude smaller or as high as 170 meV/ atom have also been reported. For a single hydrocarbon molecule, here C 12 on graphite, the model-predicted adsorption energy at T ) 0 K is 1.3 eV in vacuum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is nominal for a small deformation but it is significant for a large enough deformation to make the minimum wall-wall distance comparable to the interlayer separation of graphite. This atomic interaction was obtained by a semiempirical analysis of the interlayer binding of graphite 42,43 and consists of the interaction reproducing the ab initio DFT calculations in the local density approximation ͑LDA͒ and the van der Waals interaction not taken into account in the DFT calculations.…”
Section: A Radial Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interlayer bonding is largely determined by van der Waals interactions, which cannot be correctly described by conventional DFT methods. 42 In recent years, many efforts have been made to calculate the interlayer interaction of layered compounds, including graphite, using other theoretical methods. [42][43][44][45] The diamond phase, though, can be well addressed with the DFT method used in this work.…”
Section: A Definition Of Formation Enthalpymentioning
confidence: 99%