2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetic, exergetic and environmental life cycle assessment analyses as tools for optimization of hydrogen production by autothermal reforming of bioethanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the basic scheme, a comparison was made with some processes published in the scientific literature. The FU was changed to 1 kg of hydrogen produced in the plant with 99.9 vol% purity by steam reforming (Figure 6), in agreement with other reforming studies using other raw materials for hydrogen production (Hajjaji et al, 2016(Hajjaji et al, , 2013Khila et al, 2016;Susmozas et al, 2016Susmozas et al, , 2015Susmozas et al, , 2013, thus allowing the comparison of does not consider the operation of the SOFC Battery, consequently the output stream of the system is led to a purification system: First, the WGS process removes carbon monoxide and produces a small amount of additional hydrogen. Additionally, in a COPROX reactor the remaining CO can be further reduced to CO2 in the presence of oxygen.…”
Section: Comparative Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the basic scheme, a comparison was made with some processes published in the scientific literature. The FU was changed to 1 kg of hydrogen produced in the plant with 99.9 vol% purity by steam reforming (Figure 6), in agreement with other reforming studies using other raw materials for hydrogen production (Hajjaji et al, 2016(Hajjaji et al, , 2013Khila et al, 2016;Susmozas et al, 2016Susmozas et al, , 2015Susmozas et al, , 2013, thus allowing the comparison of does not consider the operation of the SOFC Battery, consequently the output stream of the system is led to a purification system: First, the WGS process removes carbon monoxide and produces a small amount of additional hydrogen. Additionally, in a COPROX reactor the remaining CO can be further reduced to CO2 in the presence of oxygen.…”
Section: Comparative Analysissupporting
confidence: 60%
“…SBR-H2: Steam reforming of bioethanol, including bioethanol production (Hajjaji et al, 2016). BAR-H2: Autothermal reforming of bioethanol (Khila et al, 2016).…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from these findings, Khila et al [27,28] extended the analysis giving up the solid carbon species representing the catalyst coking (which is indeed minimized for steam-to-ethanol ratios higher than 4 and reforming temperatures above 500 °C, but developing full process flow diagrams with separated WGS and methanation sections for the three options (pure SR, POX, and ATR) and With these configurations and the typical operating condition specified below, the overall material balances obtained are as follows (Table 2, [26]). These results are obtained on the basis of the thermodynamic 'atom equilibrium', only, and are therefore useful to find the maximum hydrogen yield or to represent reactors with an excess catalyst hold-up.…”
Section: T (°C)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Starting from these findings, Khila et al [27,28] extended the analysis giving up the solid carbon species representing the catalyst coking (which is indeed minimized for steam-to-ethanol ratios higher than 4 and reforming temperatures above 500 • C, but developing full process flow diagrams with separated WGS and methanation sections for the three options (pure SR, POX, and ATR) and analyzing the exergy inputs and outputs (see the cited reference for the details of this thermodynamic potential). Their results are synthetically reported in Table 3.…”
Section: T (°C)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, from the perspective of this impact category, the recovery of the hydrogen from waste gas streams resulted in a completely preferable option when compared to alternative production processes, most of them with AP values above 10 g SO 2 eq. [60,61].…”
Section: Life-cycle Impact Assessment Based On Hydrogen Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%