2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energetic Efficiency of an Existing Waste to Energy Power Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The feedstock fed to the process was excluded from the evaluation because, if not utilised, it would have to be disposed of. However, waste could be disposed with an energy recover, so in E3 we consider Maria et al, 2016) has been taken into account. Also observing trend of E3 value, the higher the LHV the lower the eective energy consumption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The feedstock fed to the process was excluded from the evaluation because, if not utilised, it would have to be disposed of. However, waste could be disposed with an energy recover, so in E3 we consider Maria et al, 2016) has been taken into account. Also observing trend of E3 value, the higher the LHV the lower the eective energy consumption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 emission coming from the conventional production of power, which would be generated by a WtE process using 1 ton of RDF; for such calculation a mean energy eciency of WtE systems equal to 21% has been considered (Di Maria et al, 2016); assuming power production from CH 4 employment, the CO 2 equivalent of fugitive CH 4 has been added to the estimated nal value.…”
Section: Co 2 Production and Emission Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to a cement kiln, energy losses during heat transfer in a traditional WTE plant are much higher as the number of sites where heat transfer takes place are much higher. Therefore, a typical WTE plant can reach an average efficiency of 13% [18], which is much lower than a cement kiln. Some of the latest and state of the art WTE in Denmark are able to an efficiency of 27% [19].…”
Section: Waste To Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the heterogeneous nature of waste, some differences with respect to conventional fossil fuel power plants have to be considered in the energy conversion process. The efficiency Energy Conversion -Current Technologies and Future Trends of a coal burning cycle is generally around 40%, while the efficiency of a garbage incineration cycle varies between 20 and 25%, if operating in a cogeneration mode, and up to 25-35% in the case of power production only [8,[26][27][28]. In general, fuel quality (i.e., waste) and other technical conditions (e.g., plant size, low temperature sources, etc.)…”
Section: Incinerationmentioning
confidence: 99%