Energeia in Aristotle’s Metaphysics IX

Polansky, Ronald

doi:10.5840/ancientphil1983323

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…But there is much dispute regarding the right use of these terms and many different meanings of the term energeia in the philosophy of Aristotle, that it may create more ambiguity than clarity. (On the ambiguity of the meaning of this distinction see Chung-Hwan, 1956; Cohen, 2006; Gonzalez, 2006; Polansky, 1983. )…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Worthy leisure education: Teaching here and now

Segev

2018

Research in Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to show the potential unification between studying the school's academic curriculum and developing moral virtues, two matters commonly considered to be separated, I suggest the approach of worthy leisure education. Drawing on the tradition of paideia and liberal arts education, I describe the inner connection between school and leisure and the inner connection between the leisure of school and the preferred liberal virtue. This educational approach calls for teachers to create their lessons, the educational gatherings, as events which are not directed at outcomes beyond themselves. I name this approach to teaching: non-outcome-based teaching, or teaching here and now. I conclude the article by describing a number of virtues that teachers who wish to excel in implementing this approach should develop.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Worthy leisure education: Teaching here and now

Segev

2018

Research in Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Besondere Einzelaspekte der Lehre vorn Vermögen und der Wirklichkeit haben die Aufmerksamkeit anderer Wissenschaftler auf sich gezogen: So zum Beispiel der Aristotelische Begriff der Möglichkeit, der in seinem Zusammenhang mit der Modallogik und mit der Polemik des Aristoteles gegen die Megariker untersucht wurde (Hartmann 1938und 1958, Bärthlein 1963, Stallmach 1965, Bärthlein 1965, Weiner 1970, Seel 1982aund 1982b, Rosen 1982; oder die Unterscheidung zwischen Wirklichkeit (energeia) und Bewegung (kinesis) aus der Perspektive der analytischen Philosophie (Ackrill 1965, Mulhern 1968, White 1980) oder deren Kritiker (Leszl 1969, Mamo 1970, Polansky 1983, Halper 1983-84, Brague 1988a. Seit einiger Zeit sind jedoch auch systematische Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung einzelner Ausdrücke (Chen 1956-57 und 1958, Blair 1967, Trépanier 1970) oder zur aristotelischen Lehre allgemein (Uwe 1965, Kosman 1984, Couloubaritsis 1985 wiederaufgenommen worden.…”

unclassified