2019 American Control Conference (ACC) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2019.8814779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endurance Maximizing Periodic Control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the approximate optimal fuel consumption obtained by the FIPS-ED method is larger than those recorded in [32] using the shooting method and the differential flatness based method, which were 0.07686 kg/s and 0.07710 kg/s with periods 9.96 s and 10.08 s, respectively. However, there are a number of observations which largely support our results; we describe them in the following items:…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that the approximate optimal fuel consumption obtained by the FIPS-ED method is larger than those recorded in [32] using the shooting method and the differential flatness based method, which were 0.07686 kg/s and 0.07710 kg/s with periods 9.96 s and 10.08 s, respectively. However, there are a number of observations which largely support our results; we describe them in the following items:…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…includes the usual parameters σ and m, the final time T f , the time-dependent Lagrange multiplier associated with the UAV speed λ V , and a user-defined constant smoothing factor s m of large value, which varies depending on how sharp the bang-bang thrust is needed in the sense that lim s m →∞ Φ s m (t) = T (t) ∀t ∈ Ω T f . However, Φ s m is very ill-conditioned for λ V (0) values near the recorded numerical value −0.01626 in [32] with increasing sensitivity as s m → ∞. Table 2 shows the values of Φ s m for λ V (0) = −0.01626 and its perturbed value λV (0) = −0.01627 for some increasing values of s m ; the values of σ and m are as quoted from Table 3.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations