2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-009-0603-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endpoint perfect tracking control of robots — A robust non inversion-based approach

Abstract: This paper presents a simple and robust non inversion-based perfect tracking control (RNIBPTC) strategy for robot manipulators. The proposed approach is capable to eliminate the environmental problems arising from classic feedforward control design and so guarantees an appropriate level of robustness of control system to uncertainties including external disturbances, unmodeled dynamics, friction force and variation of payload. Extensive simulation results performed using a two degree-of-freedom actuated elbow … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To show the capability of the proposed controller in tasks where precise tracking of fast and complex trajectories is required, we used a second desired trajectory as Reference , where the initial manipulator configuration is q0=[]3.42182.28050.19711.3481.7420.1406T. This trajectory is very important, since it involves rapid and complex reactions between different dynamics of the manipulator.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To show the capability of the proposed controller in tasks where precise tracking of fast and complex trajectories is required, we used a second desired trajectory as Reference , where the initial manipulator configuration is q0=[]3.42182.28050.19711.3481.7420.1406T. This trajectory is very important, since it involves rapid and complex reactions between different dynamics of the manipulator.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop our control scheme, assume that Equation (20) can be represented by a nonlinear differential equation, called “ available model ” as trueJ^sboldqboldx¨+F=ut where F=trueJ^s1boldqMboldxtrueJ^sboldqboldx¨+Nx,boldx˙boldx˙+Gboldxm is referred to as the lumped uncertainty.Remark Some previous valuable published works have exploited the universal approximation property of Neural Network (NN) to actuator nonlinearities compensation, although the problems originated by NN and Fuzzy approaches still exist, as mentioned in References .…”
Section: Dynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If disturbance is δ(t) = t.cos(wt), then p = 4, b 1 = b 3 = 0, b 2 = −2w 2 , and b 4 = −1 − w 4 are recommended. 50,52 As a further example, consider the differential equation δ (2) (t) = 0 which is satisfied by δ(t) = t. In the first view, it is possible to think that δ(t) = t is not in the postulated form (11), which is not true. It can be easily shown that, choosing…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we consider actuator saturation compensation to achieve optimal tracking and disturbance rejection for the motion control of robots as an extended form of [16]. For this purpose, suppose (4) is rewritten in the following state and output equation form as …”
Section: Description Of Control Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core idea of these defenitions is that perturbation can be approximated by a p th order ordinary differential equation (ODE) as (18) [16,17].…”
Section: Description Of Control Structurementioning
confidence: 99%