2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24842-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endowing Spoken Language Dialogue Systems with Emotional Intelligence

Abstract: While most dialogue systems restrict themselves to the adjustment of the propositional contents, our work concentrates on the generation of stylistic variations in order to improve the user's perception of the interaction. To accomplish this goal, our approach integrates a social theory of politeness with a cognitive theory of emotions. We propose a hierarchical selection process for politeness behaviors in order to enable the refinement of decisions in case additional context information becomes available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents one aspect of a very significant effort to design emotion and personality models for agents (e.g. [2,17,10,38,32,1,15,31]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents one aspect of a very significant effort to design emotion and personality models for agents (e.g. [2,17,10,38,32,1,15,31]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each condition, a video showing a dialogue between a human and a virtual agent was recorded 1,2,3,4 . In the videos, a caregiver, called Louisa, interacts with the dialogue system by a virtual avatar called Christian.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being more polite does not become repetitive if the propositional content of the system actions changes. André et al [1] have proposed the adjustment of the politeness level for adaptation. While the robotic tutor of Saerbeck et al [8] uses hard adaptation in the form of fixed motivational sentences, it also employs soft adaptation, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the emphasis on low-level processes in dialogue behaviour leads to models that are more concerned with the central place of emotion and feelings in dialogue behaviour (See Damasio, 1999 regarding the revival of emotions in psychology and André et al, 2004 for work on affective dialogue systems).…”
Section: Trends and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, it is in the spirit of the annual workshops on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (semdial) and the sigdial workshops on Discourse and Dialogue, which bring together researchers from a variety of backgrounds to discuss recent development in dialogue research. 1 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%