Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation versus Conventional Surgery in Treatment of Primary Varicose Vein of the Lower Limb)Prospective Randomized Controlled Study)

Abstract

Background Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of primary varicose vein are thought to minimize postoperative morbidity and reduce work loss compared with the conventional surgical procedure. Aim of the Work to determine, whether endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) have any advantages or disadvantages in comparison with conventional surgery, in the treatment of primary varicose vein. Patients and Methods this is a prospective randomized study. Thirty Patients presented at Vascular Outpatient Clinic for management of chronic venous insufficiency. All patients underwent clinical examination and duplex ultrasonography. Ten (10) patients were treated with ligation and stripping of the GSV or SSV. Ten (10) patients were treated with Radiofrequency ablation. Ten (10) patients were treated with endovenous laser ablation. The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals and Helwan University Hospitals. The study took place from September 2017 to June 2018. Results Compared with conventional surgery, endovenous ablation methods reduce postoperative discomfort and pain, with a lower complication rate after treatment for avoidance of a groin incision and dissection at the saphenofemoral confluence. Cosmetic demands are also better satisfied. However, risks of EVLA and RFA remain in terms of recanalization and neoreflux via junctional tributaries. Conclusion RFA and EVLA are minimally invasive procedures. Their potential early benefits, by avoiding groin dissection and GSV stripping, have been confirmed by the findings from this trial. Current evidence based on randomized trials consistently demonstrates significant early benefits after RFA and EVLA in suitable patients with varicose veins.