2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovenous ablation with concomitant phlebectomy is a safe and effective method of treatment for symptomatic patients with axial reflux and large incompetent tributaries

Abstract: The majority of patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency benefit from endovenous RFA of incompetent saphenous veins with comparable results to published surgical outcomes for endovenous closure. The great majority of patients with refluxing tributary veins greater than 3 mm in diameter required phlebectomy in addition to saphenous ablation. These patients may benefit from concomitant phlebectomy along with endovenous saphenous closure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Es controversial la flebectomía de venas tributarias varicosas concomitante en el mismo acto quirúrgico con la obliteración de la vena safena insuficiente o diferida 18 . Existen argumentos que avalan la cirugía simultánea que evita una segunda intervención 19 , aunque se ha publicado que una vez realizada la obliteración del tronco safeno, menos de la mitad de los pacientes vuelve a realizarse una flebectomía 20 . En esta casuística preferimos efectuar estos procedimientos en una sola intervención, tomando en cuenta la idiosincrasia de nuestros pacientes, que solicitan terminar el problema en un solo tiempo quirúrgico, sin tener que volver a completar la extracción de las colaterales varicosas después, pues todos nuestros pacientes presentaron gruesas venas tributarias dilatadas sintomáticas.…”
Section: Comentariounclassified
“…Es controversial la flebectomía de venas tributarias varicosas concomitante en el mismo acto quirúrgico con la obliteración de la vena safena insuficiente o diferida 18 . Existen argumentos que avalan la cirugía simultánea que evita una segunda intervención 19 , aunque se ha publicado que una vez realizada la obliteración del tronco safeno, menos de la mitad de los pacientes vuelve a realizarse una flebectomía 20 . En esta casuística preferimos efectuar estos procedimientos en una sola intervención, tomando en cuenta la idiosincrasia de nuestros pacientes, que solicitan terminar el problema en un solo tiempo quirúrgico, sin tener que volver a completar la extracción de las colaterales varicosas después, pues todos nuestros pacientes presentaron gruesas venas tributarias dilatadas sintomáticas.…”
Section: Comentariounclassified
“…Concomitant treatment of varicosities is associated with optimal improvement in both clinical disease severity and quality of life. 19,20 Superficial and Deep Venous Insufficiency It is not rare to see patients with both superficial and deep venous insufficiency. The most common cause is the valve insufficiency of the deep veins due to DVT; in rare conditions it can be due to congenital valve or vessel abnormalities.…”
Section: Ambulatory Phlebectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venous reflux increases the risk of developing varicose veins, especially in cases of combined deep and superficial reflux. 19 An incompetent vessel due to venous refluxing is itself unnecessary and useless because it is carrying venous blood in a retrograde direction and causes symptoms. Graduated compression has been proven useful in managing venous insufficiency.…”
Section: Ambulatory Phlebectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem normally presents as a finding on posttreatment duplex scans and can resolve without any anticoagulation treatment. A four-level classification system and management strategies have been suggested for EHIT 28,29. Patients with complete occlusion of the deep vein by EHIT should be treated with anticoagulation while partial occlusion may be left to the clinician’s discretion, although debate continues on the matter.…”
Section: Findings From Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%