2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1330361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovaskuläre Therapie des akut ischämischen Schlaganfalls unter Analgosedierung im Vergleich zur Intubationsnarkose - Durchführbarkeit, periprozedurale Sicherheit, klinisches und radiologisches Outcome

Abstract: Abstract! Purpose: Vessel recanalization is an important predictor of clinical outcome in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Endovascular therapies are used with increasing frequency. There is no general agreement on the policy of anesthesia during endovascular therapy, ranging from general anesthesia (GA) to local anesthesia at the puncture site with conscious sedation (CS) as needed. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility and radiological and clinical outcome of endovascular str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One patient had a subarachnoid haemorrhage due to intraprocedural dissection of the anterior choroid artery, which had to be occluded using N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue. In this and two other cases intracranial hypertension due to Published literature suggests that patients treated under general anaesthesia have a longer time to recanalization [25] and poorer outcome [26] as compared with patients treated under conscious sedation. In our series, eight patients (18.6 %) were treated without general anaesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…One patient had a subarachnoid haemorrhage due to intraprocedural dissection of the anterior choroid artery, which had to be occluded using N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue. In this and two other cases intracranial hypertension due to Published literature suggests that patients treated under general anaesthesia have a longer time to recanalization [25] and poorer outcome [26] as compared with patients treated under conscious sedation. In our series, eight patients (18.6 %) were treated without general anaesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…21 22 31 In contrary, GA groups could suffer from worse neurological function, lower BP, aspiration pneumonia and/or high mortality. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] A recent retrospective, matched, case-control study of patients with posterior circulation AIS is the only study to explore the effect of anaesthesia management on outcome of patients with posterior AIS, however, great limitation and drawbacks in terms of study design, including selection bias and information bias impede the credibility of the results. 21 Several confounding factors contribute to inconclusive results, including specific information of peri-interventional management, such as BP, partial pressure of carbon dioxide and strict uniform anaesthesia protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deshalb ist auch in den bereits publizierten großen Schlaganfallstudien diesbezüglich kein Prozedere standardisiert, sodass die Wahl der Narkose/Sedierung zwischen den meisten publizierten Studien nicht gut vergleichbar -falls überhaupt erhoben -ist [11].…”
Section: Sedierung Vs Intubationunclassified
“…Diese Unterschiede im Behandlungsergebnis in Abhängigkeit vom prozeduralen Management waren in einer retrospektiven Arbeit sowohl für den vorderen als auch den hinteren Stromkreislauf nachweisbar [11].…”
Section: Sedierung Vs Intubationunclassified