2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular versus open repair of isolated superficial femoral and popliteal artery injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Outside selected scenarios, the primary patency of a below-the-knee bypass with the saphenous vein remains superior [ 11 , 12 ]. A retrospective study of the National Trauma Data Bank of patients who suffered a blunt or penetrating injury of the superficial femoral artery and/or the popliteal artery reported an overall incidence of superficial femoral and/or popliteal arterial injury in 0.2% of all trauma patients [ 1 ]. Endovascular repair was performed in 5.7%, but interestingly, the authors noticed an increase in endovascular stent placement over the seven-year study period (3.2% in 2007 versus 7.6% in 2014), suggesting that endovascular repair is becoming more prevalent in the United States and Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Outside selected scenarios, the primary patency of a below-the-knee bypass with the saphenous vein remains superior [ 11 , 12 ]. A retrospective study of the National Trauma Data Bank of patients who suffered a blunt or penetrating injury of the superficial femoral artery and/or the popliteal artery reported an overall incidence of superficial femoral and/or popliteal arterial injury in 0.2% of all trauma patients [ 1 ]. Endovascular repair was performed in 5.7%, but interestingly, the authors noticed an increase in endovascular stent placement over the seven-year study period (3.2% in 2007 versus 7.6% in 2014), suggesting that endovascular repair is becoming more prevalent in the United States and Canada.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies of patients undergoing open versus endovascular repair are limited to small retrospective cohorts but risks of limb loss appear similar in patients undergoing endovascular versus open repair. Potter et al reported that in-hospital amputation-free survival was similar between patients who underwent open versus endovascular repair, but their cohorts included patients with femoral and popliteal injuries [ 1 ]. Surprisingly, overall mortality was higher in those undergoing endovascular stenting while the rate of fasciotomy was lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Keywords: Lower extremity trauma; Popliteal artery; Popliteal injury; Vascular trauma Traumatic popliteal vascular injuries present a serious clinical challenge, because they are associated with the highest risk of limb loss of all peripheral vascular injuries, with major amputation rates of 14% to 25% in the civilian population. [1][2][3][4] The amputation rate is high in part because of the association with mangled extremities, which represent a subset of these injuries. In 1988, Johansen et al, 5 at Harborview Medical Center, developed the mangled extremity severity score (MESS) in an effort to determine for which patients attempts at limb salvage would be futile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-operative treatment is definitely not recommended if popliteal artery injuries are significant and present with acutely ischemic limbs [ 5 ]. Although significantly reduced amputation rates for PAI have been achieved with improved revascularization technology, it is still a challenge for orthopedic surgeons mainly due to the heterogeneous patient populations with moderately to severely blunt PAI [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%