2023
DOI: 10.5853/jos.2022.03692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular Treatment of Distal-M2 Segment Occlusions: A Clinical Registry and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of our deep learning algorithm to accurately predict isolated MCA-M2 occlusion with good performance is of significant importance. Although isolated MCA-M2 occlusion is an important and emerging target of the EVT, 24 it was reported that the rate of misdiagnosis for isolated MCA-M2 occlusion is substantially higher than that for intracranial LVO even among the neuroimaging specialists (35.0% vs. 9.7%, respectively), 25 and the use of previously developed deep learning models has yielded worse results (50.8%). 20 This characteristic of isolated MCA-M2 occlusion have influenced our model as well, leading to improved specificity and NPV compared to previous studies, 20,21 despite with somewhat less satisfactory sensitivity and PPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of our deep learning algorithm to accurately predict isolated MCA-M2 occlusion with good performance is of significant importance. Although isolated MCA-M2 occlusion is an important and emerging target of the EVT, 24 it was reported that the rate of misdiagnosis for isolated MCA-M2 occlusion is substantially higher than that for intracranial LVO even among the neuroimaging specialists (35.0% vs. 9.7%, respectively), 25 and the use of previously developed deep learning models has yielded worse results (50.8%). 20 This characteristic of isolated MCA-M2 occlusion have influenced our model as well, leading to improved specificity and NPV compared to previous studies, 20,21 despite with somewhat less satisfactory sensitivity and PPV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%