2022
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular therapy versus no endovascular therapy in patients receiving best medical management for acute isolated occlusion of the posterior cerebral artery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Background and purpose Endovascular therapy (EVT) is increasingly reported for treatment of isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusions although its clinical benefit remains uncertain. This study‐level meta‐analysis investigated the functional outcomes and safety of EVT and best medical management (BMM) compared to BMM alone for treatment of PCA occlusion stroke. Methods We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase for studies in patients with isolated PCA occlusion stroke trea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses from 88.4% of neurointerventionalists indicated that they would proceed to EVT in a patient with an occlusion of any segment of the basilar artery, and 52.4% would additionally proceed to EVT with an occlusion of the V4 segment of the vertebral artery or of the P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery. 22,23 The opinions of neurointerventionalists in this survey align closely with the inclusion criteria of the ATTENTION trial, suggesting the results of this trial may align with current clinical practice. Neurointerventionalists in this survey were permissive of treating patients with increased premorbid status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Responses from 88.4% of neurointerventionalists indicated that they would proceed to EVT in a patient with an occlusion of any segment of the basilar artery, and 52.4% would additionally proceed to EVT with an occlusion of the V4 segment of the vertebral artery or of the P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery. 22,23 The opinions of neurointerventionalists in this survey align closely with the inclusion criteria of the ATTENTION trial, suggesting the results of this trial may align with current clinical practice. Neurointerventionalists in this survey were permissive of treating patients with increased premorbid status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…CTA can aid in understanding the underlying pathophysiology of the stroke, including arterial dissection, carotid or intracranial atherosclerosis, carotid web, and intracranial vasculopathy (Figure 6). 35,36,[47][48][49] The ability to discern carotid pseudo-occlusion from a carotid terminus occlusion versus tandem proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) atherosclerotic occlusion remains a limitation of CTA, even when adjudicated by experienced radiologists. 50 CTA evaluating the head and neck vessels informs neurointerventionalists who are planning an endovascular procedure on the access of an intracranial target, including bovine or hostile aortic arch and whether radial or femoral arterial access is more appropriate.…”
Section: Ct Angiogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, single phase CTA is often timed at peak arterial phase when the contrast may not have yet opacified collateral vessels and may therefore underestimate the extent of collateral blood flow. CTA can aid in understanding the underlying pathophysiology of the stroke, including arterial dissection, carotid or intracranial atherosclerosis, carotid web, and intracranial vasculopathy ( Figure 6 ) [ 35 , 36 , 47 - 49 ]. The ability to discern carotid pseudo-occlusion from a carotid terminus occlusion versus tandem proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) atherosclerotic occlusion remains a limitation of CTA, even when adjudicated by experienced radiologists [ 50 ].…”
Section: Ct-based Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a few observational studies have compared BMM+EVT and BMM alone in this population, all reporting similar 3-month functional outcome in the 2 treatment groups. 3,4,9–11 However, these studies were limited by moderate sample sizes, 3,9,10 or the exclusion of patients with the most proximal occlusion (ie, first segment of the PCA) where a benefit of EVT may be more likely. 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%