Endovascular Therapy Provides Similar Results of Bypass Graft Surgery in the Treatment of Infrainguinal Multilevel Arterial Disease in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in All GLASS Stages

Casella, Ivan Benaduce; Sartori, C.H.; Faustino, Carolina Brito; Mariz, Maria Paula Vieira; Presti, Calógero; Puech-Leão, Pedro; Luccia, Nélson De

doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.028

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 31 publications, published between 1991 and 2022, from a total of 3451 connected investigations that met the inclusion criteria were chosen and involved in the investigation 11‐41 . The results of these researches are presented in Table 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Amputation and limb salvage following endovascular and open surgery for the treatment of peripheral artery illnesses: A meta‐analysis

Wang,

Li,

Chen

et al. 2023

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A meta‐analysis investigation was executed to measure the outcome of endovascular surgery (ES) and open surgery (OS) for the management of peripheral artery diseases (PADs) on amputation and limb salvage (LS). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 3451 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 31 chosen investigations enclosed 19 948 individuals with PADs were in the chosen investigations' starting point, 8861 of them were utilising ES, and 11 087 were utilising OS. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilised to compute the value of the effect of ES and OS for the management of PADs on amputation and LS by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. ES had significantly lower amputation (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68‐0.93, P = 0.005) compared with those with OS in individuals with PADs. No significant difference was found between ES and OS in 30‐day LS (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.64‐1.42, P = 0.81), 1‐year LS (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.81‐1.39, P = 0.68), and 3‐year LS (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61‐1.19, P = 0.36) in individuals with PADs. ES had significantly lower amputation, 30‐day LS, 1‐year LS, and 3‐year LS compared with those with OS in individuals with PADs. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta‐analysis.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In investigations that were considered for the meta‐analysis, 19 948 individuals with PADs were in the chosen investigations' starting point, 8861 of them were utilising ES, and 11 087 were utilising OS 11‐41 . ES had significantly lower amputation compared with those with OS in individuals with PADs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%