2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00370-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular stent placement in the treatment of upper extremity central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
65
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
65
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,[15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][26][27][28] Additionally, also in common with other authors, 20,21 we did not observe superior patency in angioplasties with stents. Notwithstanding, our results differ with …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,[15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][26][27][28] Additionally, also in common with other authors, 20,21 we did not observe superior patency in angioplasties with stents. Notwithstanding, our results differ with …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Patency can vary from 72 to 100% at 3 months, through 55 to 100% at 6 months to 56 to 97% at 12 months. 20,[23][24][25][26][27][28] To our knowledge, to date there have been no prospective controlled studies comparing angioplasties with and without stents for treatment of COVD. In a retrospective study published by Bakken et al in 2007 20 and comparing angioplasties with and without stents, the authors showed that there were no significant differences in patency results between angioplasties with and without stents ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) guidelines have indicated stent placement for central vein lesions (30). Some investigators have even argued that central venous lesions represent a primary indication for stent placement due to the poor outcome usually found with balloon dilation alone (18,31). The work of Gerald Beathard supports this assertion (32).…”
Section: Stents and Central Venous Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nineteen cases (26%) necessitated additional stent placement. Aytekin et al (18) evaluated the efficacy of stent placement for treating upper extremity CVS in 14 hemodialysis patients. The 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo primary patency rates were 92.8%, 85.7%, 50%, and 14.3%.…”
Section: Stents and Central Venous Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,[8][9][10] Using a covered stent or the use of endovascular brachytherapy seems not to enhance the patency rate. 11,12) Several anatomical changes inside the central veins may predispose to PTA failure. Long-standing stenosis may provoke vein fibrosis and occlusion of long venous segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%