2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVRAR): A Systematic Review

Abstract: For the treatment of symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, emergency endovascular repair (EVRAR) is feasible in selected patients, with early outcomes comparable to best conventional open surgical repair for the treatment of RAAA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, eEVAR provides improved operative mortality rates with shorter hospital and ICU stays [20]. This present study investigated and compared the effect of eOR to eEVAR on the dysfunction of various organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, eEVAR provides improved operative mortality rates with shorter hospital and ICU stays [20]. This present study investigated and compared the effect of eOR to eEVAR on the dysfunction of various organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, because of differences in interventional experience levels amongst physicians, anatomical inclusion criteria for EVAR still vary widely amongst medical centres, with eligibility rates ranging from 34 to 100 % [51]. Most studies, however, report eligibility rates over 50 % [52–55].…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over half of the patients do not reach the hospital alive [37, 58]. Even for those who are able to undergo open surgical repair, the mortality rate remains higher than 40 % [5153]. …”
Section: Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The figures found in the literature regarding the non-modifiable risk-factors, as advanced age and gender, are conflicting ([4, 7, 12, 20, 28, 32]). Our patients had an average age of 73, and 42% were ≥75 years old (Table 3).…”
Section: Non-modifiable Risk-factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%