Endovascular repair of traumatic aortic isthmic rupture: Early and mid-term results

Hammamia, M. Ben; Mrad, M. Ben; Ziadi, J.; Derbel, Bilel; Miri, Rim; Abdelaziz, E. Ben; Daoud, Zied; Krarti, N.; Koubaa, Mohamed Ali; Tarzi, M.; Khadhar, Yassine; Lagha, Aymen; Ghédira, Faker; Omrane, S. Ben; Kalfat, T.; Bounawes, I.; Denguir, Raouf

doi:10.1016/j.jdmv.2020.06.007

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Multiple injuries with severe combined lesions have been reported in the literature [ 1 , 11 , 12 ]. If the lesion is missed or surgery is delayed, diaphragm rupture, small intestine rupture, or aortic arch injury can lead to death.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The unresolved issue in treating thoracic aorta lesions is the possibility of spinal cord ischaemia, which is estimated to be up to 21% with open surgery and 0–12% with endovascular surgery [ 7 , 12 ]. Because rupture occurs more frequently at the aortic isthmus, the distance from the LSA enables proximal stent-graft fixation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because rupture occurs more frequently at the aortic isthmus, the distance from the LSA enables proximal stent-graft fixation. M. Ben Hammamia et al chose to purposefully cover the LSA in 32 patients because the landing zone was 20 mm without LSA revascularizationwith no upper arm ischaemia, or neurological complaints [ 12 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Laparotomy management of diaphragmatic and hollow viscera rupture combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair after a traffic accident: A case report

Sơn

Học

Than³

et al. 2022

Annals of Medicine &Amp; Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Laparotomy management of diaphragmatic and hollow viscera rupture combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair after a traffic accident: A case report

Sơn

Học

Than³

et al. 2022

Annals of Medicine &Amp; Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Systematic Review on Thoracic Endovascular Repair Outcomes in Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries

Nana,

Spanos,

Behrendt

et al. 2024

J Endovasc Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) represents a potentially life-threatening condition and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is recommended as the first-line treatment (Class I level of evidence C) by the current guidelines. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the perioperative and mid-term follow-up outcomes of patients with BTAI treated with TEVAR. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the English literature published between 2000 and 2022, via Ovid, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, until July 30, 2022. Observational studies and case series, with ≥5 patients, reporting on the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. Primary outcomes were technical success and 30-day mortality, cerebrovascular morbidity. Secondary outcomes were mortality and re-interventions during the mid-term follow-up. Results: From 5201 articles identified by the literature search, 35 eligible studies were included in this review. All studies had a retrospective study design. In total, 991 patients were included. The mean age was 34.5±16.5 years (range=16–89 years). Technical success was 98.0% (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.98, 0.99, p<0.001, I2=0%). Mortality at 30 days was 5.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.03, 0.06, p<0.001, I2=5.56%). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in 1.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=0%) and stroke rate was 2.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=0%). The available follow-up was estimated at 29 months (range=3–119 months) with mortality rate at 2.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=0%) and re-intervention rate at 1.0% (OR, 95% CI=0.01, 0.02, p<0.001, I2=10.5%). Conclusion: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair showed high technical success and low early cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality rates. In the mid-term follow-up, the estimated mortality and re-intervention rates were also low. Furthermore, higher quality prospective studies are needed. Clinical Impact Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is recommended as the first line treatement in patients with blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI). This systematic review of 35 retrospective studies and 991 patients showed high technical success (98.0%) with an associated 30-day mortality at 5.0% and low spinal cord ischemia (1%) and stroke rates (2.0%). Mid-term mortality and re-intervention rates reassure the effectiveness of TEVAR in BTAI cases.

show abstract

Endovascular repair of traumatic aortic isthmic rupture: Early and mid-term results

Cited by 2 publications

References 26 publications

Laparotomy management of diaphragmatic and hollow viscera rupture combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair after a traffic accident: A case report

Laparotomy management of diaphragmatic and hollow viscera rupture combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair after a traffic accident: A case report

A Systematic Review on Thoracic Endovascular Repair Outcomes in Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About