Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02458-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic subacute and chronically occluded internal carotid artery: feasibility, safety, a modified radiographic classification system, and clinical outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, endovascular revascularization was reported to have a 70% success rate, with a 13% complication rate and 5% morbidity (8)(9)(10). However, technical skills are required for complex occluded vessels, such as complicated routes, collapsed vessel walls, propagated thrombi, and vulnerable plaques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, endovascular revascularization was reported to have a 70% success rate, with a 13% complication rate and 5% morbidity (8)(9)(10). However, technical skills are required for complex occluded vessels, such as complicated routes, collapsed vessel walls, propagated thrombi, and vulnerable plaques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type D is that there is no recognizable proximal lumen, and there is no blood ow lling in the distal cavernous sinus segment and petrous segment. This classi cation does not include cases where there is an identi able lumen at the proximal end, there is no blood ow lling in the distal cavernous sinus segment and petrous segment, and simple ocular segment or communicating segment occlusion [13,14]. In addition, there is no essential difference between types A and B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasan et al [13] classi ed the patients according to the shape of the occluded proximal stump and the blood ow lling site of the occluded distal stump. In Hasan et al [13], the success/complications rates were 100%/0% for group A, 100%/13% for group B, 50%/38% for group C, and 25%/25% for group D. Mo et al [14] improved the classi cation by Hasan et al [13]. In Mo et al [14], the success rates were 90% for group A, 70% for group B, 91% for group C, and 0% for group D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who presented with CICAO on TOF-MRA or CTA and underwent both HR-MRI and DSA examinations were included in the study. The detailed inclusion criteria included ( 1 ) recanalization attempts were performed; ( 2 ) the time interval between HR-MRI and DSA was within 2 weeks; ( 3 ) HR-MRI cover the whole ICA from the bifurcation of the common carotid artery to the body of the corpus callosum; ( 4 ) the image quality of HR-MRI was adequate for evaluation; and ( 5 ) patients had one or more traditional atherosclerotic risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and current cigarette smoking. The exclusion criteria included ( 1 ) pseudo-occlusion, defined as an extremely narrow residual lumen with a string-like or more normal distal lumen ( 14 ), or severe stenosis diagnosed by DSA; ( 2 ) history of surgery between HR-MRI imaging and DSA; ( 3 ) insufficient ICA coverage or uninterpretable images due to motion artifacts; and ( 4 ) nonatherosclerotic vasculopathies, such as vasculitis, dissection, or moyamoya disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal treatment of CICAO is still unclear. Endovascular recanalization has been reported as an effective treatment for CICAO ( 3 , 4 ). Successful recanalization reconstructs normal intracranial perfusion, alleviates clinical symptoms, and restores neurocognitive function ( 5 , 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%