2014
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endovascular coiling versus parent artery occlusion for treatment of cavernous carotid aneurysms: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Background and purpose Endosaccular coil embolization and parent artery occlusion (PAO) are established endovascular techniques for treatment of cavernous carotid aneurysms. We performed a systematic review of published series on endovascular treatment of cavernous carotid aneurysms to determine outcomes and complications associated with endovascular coiling and PAO of cavernous carotid artery aneurysms. Methods In September 2013, we conducted a computerized search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for reports on endovasc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carotid sacrifice achieves a 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.0-97.0) complete aneurysm occlusion and 83.0% (95% CI, 52.0-96.0) resolution of mass effect, but is associated with a 4.0% (95% CI, 1.0-9.0) risk of procedurerelated neurological deficits. 1 However, because these aneurysms are often very large or giant with a wide neck, standard endovascular coiling achieved a complete aneurysm occlusion rate of only 67.0% (95% CI, 55.0-77.0) in a meta-analysis from 2014. 1 Furthermore, the coiling group demonstrated a retreatment rate of 18.0% (95% CI, 12.0-26.0) compared with 6.0% (95% CI, 2.0-12.0) for CVD without bypass (P=0.01).…”
Section: Angiography and Clinical Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Carotid sacrifice achieves a 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.0-97.0) complete aneurysm occlusion and 83.0% (95% CI, 52.0-96.0) resolution of mass effect, but is associated with a 4.0% (95% CI, 1.0-9.0) risk of procedurerelated neurological deficits. 1 However, because these aneurysms are often very large or giant with a wide neck, standard endovascular coiling achieved a complete aneurysm occlusion rate of only 67.0% (95% CI, 55.0-77.0) in a meta-analysis from 2014. 1 Furthermore, the coiling group demonstrated a retreatment rate of 18.0% (95% CI, 12.0-26.0) compared with 6.0% (95% CI, 2.0-12.0) for CVD without bypass (P=0.01).…”
Section: Angiography and Clinical Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, because these aneurysms are often very large or giant with a wide neck, standard endovascular coiling achieved a complete aneurysm occlusion rate of only 67.0% (95% CI, 55.0-77.0) in a meta-analysis from 2014. 1 Furthermore, the coiling group demonstrated a retreatment rate of 18.0% (95% CI, 12.0-26.0) compared with 6.0% (95% CI, 2.0-12.0) for CVD without bypass (P=0.01). However, there were no differences in the improvement of mass effect between coiling, SAC, and CVD.…”
Section: Angiography and Clinical Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25) Under existing circumstances, if the patient is judged to have ischemic tol erance by BTO, PAO should be considered first because of its rapid effects on compression symptoms and high radical ity as a treatment for aneurysms. 26) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17) Due to the advent of flow diverters, PAO of the internal carotid artery is expected to be performed less frequently in the future. However, the sum of the mortality and complication rates has been reported to be 10%, 18,19) and, according…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%