2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1608.00499
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endotrivial modules for finite groups via homotopy theory

Jesper Grodal

Abstract: Classifying endotrivial kG-modules, i.e., elements of the Picard group of the stable module category for an arbitrary finite group G, has been a long-running quest, which by deep work of Dade, Alperin, Carlson, Thévenaz, and others, has been reduced to understanding the subgroup consisting of modular representations that split as the trivial module direct sum a projective module when restricted to a Sylow p-subgroup. In this paper we identify this subgroup as the first cohomology group of the orbit category on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first recall some definitions on categories with group action. We follow the terminology and notation introduced by Grodal in [13] and [14]. Let G be a discrete group.…”
Section: Dwyer Spaces For Centralizer and Normalizer Decompositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first recall some definitions on categories with group action. We follow the terminology and notation introduced by Grodal in [13] and [14]. Let G be a discrete group.…”
Section: Dwyer Spaces For Centralizer and Normalizer Decompositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The third main ingredient relies on major new results obtained by J. Grodal through the use of homotopy theory in [Gro99], or more precisely on a slight extension of the main theorem of [Gro99] recently obtained by D. Craven in [Cra20] and which provides us with purely group-theoretic techniques to deal with Grodal's description of K(G) in [Gro99, Theorem 4.27]. The latter results will in particular enable us to treat families of groups related to the finite groups of Lie type SL 3 (q) with q ≡ 3 (mod 4) and SU 3 (q) with q ≡ 1 (mod 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest non-example is a finite field, and our third theorem analyses this case to see the difference with the plus construction. As we will explain below, the resulting theorem should properly be attributed to Jesper Grodal, since in [Gro18] he proved a more general result in the context of arbitrary finite groups which specialises to this result for G = GL(M). However, we do give an independent proof based on the general machinery for analysing RBS(M) categories that we develop.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The crucial point is part 2, that | RBS(V )| has the F p -homology of a point. This can also be deduced from a more general theorem of Jesper Grodal, [Gro18]. Indeed, Grodal's Theorem 4.3 says that for any finite group G and prime p, if C denotes the p-radical orbit category of G, then |C| has the F p -homology of a point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%