2010
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded onto β-TCP Granules Enhance Early Vascularization and Bone Healing in a Critical-Sized Bone Defect in Rats

Abstract: This cell approach suggests that there is a synergistic effect and that the initial stage of neovascularization by EPCs is considered to be crucial for complete bone regeneration in the late phase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
161
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
9
161
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such increase in vascularization could make a direct contribution to bone formation, as evident in the increased ectopic bone formed in the EPC/MSC constructs, suggesting an interdependent relationship between vascularization and bone formation. Usami et al found a 1.6-fold higher capillary score formation on both the surface and central regions of canine-EPC/MSC scaffolds, accompanied by a 1.3-fold increase in bone area regenerated in subcutaneous implants [14], while Seebach et al demonstrated increased early vascularization in the first 4 weeks with improved bone regeneration and healing in a rat critical-sized femoral defect model after EPC/MSC implantation compared to MSC alone [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such increase in vascularization could make a direct contribution to bone formation, as evident in the increased ectopic bone formed in the EPC/MSC constructs, suggesting an interdependent relationship between vascularization and bone formation. Usami et al found a 1.6-fold higher capillary score formation on both the surface and central regions of canine-EPC/MSC scaffolds, accompanied by a 1.3-fold increase in bone area regenerated in subcutaneous implants [14], while Seebach et al demonstrated increased early vascularization in the first 4 weeks with improved bone regeneration and healing in a rat critical-sized femoral defect model after EPC/MSC implantation compared to MSC alone [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have cocultured putative EPC with MSC or osteoblast-like cell types on the premise that this strategy will generate prevascular networks within bone tissue-engineered grafts to aid bone repair [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, the majority of studies used ECs [19][20][21][22][23] rather than ECFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators, including our group, have recently started to examine the potential of ECs (or EPCs) to treat criticalsized bone defects, either on their own [10,58,59] or in combination with MSCs [60][61][62][63]. Our preliminary study shows that there is a synergistic effect between ECs (HUVECs) and MSCs in promoting bone regeneration when implanted at the fracture gap of the large bone defects created by osteotomy at the tibial epiphysis of host recipients (orthotopic implantation) (preliminary data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This can be due both to the osteogenic and the vascular differentiation potential of MSC and EPC. In fact, cell-based therapy of MSC and EPC has been previously reported in literature in different studies [22,23,[37][38][39][40] indicating a potential to provide vascularization for constructs used in bone regeneration. Our findings, that pre-differentiated MSC/EPC showed higher bone formation by trend, confirm these cell-based strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, recent investigations of our laboratory have focused on implantation of undifferentiated MSC and EPC seeded onto Tricalciumphosphate (TCP) which demonstrated enhanced bone regeneration and improved vascularization of critical size bone defects [22][23][24]. In these previous studies EPC demonstrated real angiogenic contribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%