2014
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endosomal Localization of TLR8 Confers Distinctive Proteolytic Processing on Human Myeloid Cells

Abstract: Nucleic acid–sensing TLRs are involved in both antimicrobial immune responses and autoimmune inflammation. TLR8 is phylogenetically and structurally related to TLR7 and TLR9, which undergo proteolytic processing in the endolysosomes to generate functional receptors. Recent structural analyses of human TLR8 ectodomain and its liganded form demonstrated that TLR8 is also cleaved, and both the N- and C-terminal halves contribute to ligand binding. However, the structures and ssRNA recognition mode of endogenous T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(73 reference statements)
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, two TLR8 bands of ∼100 kDa were not completely eliminated even several days after mRNA knockdown. These bands probably correspond to N-terminal fragments of TLR8 after cleavage in endosomes and can be a functional PRR as recently shown (32). MDMs showed similar responses as monocytes, as costimulation with synthetic TLR2 ligand or S. aureus lipoproteins strongly antagonized IFN-b induction by S. aureus and synthetic TLR8 ligand (not shown).…”
Section: S Aureus Induces Ifn-b Via Tlr8 and Irf5supporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, two TLR8 bands of ∼100 kDa were not completely eliminated even several days after mRNA knockdown. These bands probably correspond to N-terminal fragments of TLR8 after cleavage in endosomes and can be a functional PRR as recently shown (32). MDMs showed similar responses as monocytes, as costimulation with synthetic TLR2 ligand or S. aureus lipoproteins strongly antagonized IFN-b induction by S. aureus and synthetic TLR8 ligand (not shown).…”
Section: S Aureus Induces Ifn-b Via Tlr8 and Irf5supporting
confidence: 68%
“…in the endosomes/lysosomes, whereas nonimmune cells such as MEFs and epithelial cells have low levels of UNC93B1, resulting in the predominance of the uncleaved form of these TLRs in the ER (5,11,31,32). In the steady-state, UNC93B1 controls trafficking of NA-sensing TLRs from the ER through binding to their transmembrane domains and the juxtamembrane region at the ER (12)(13)(14)33), and coexists with translocated TLRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TLR3, 7, 8, and 9 sense endocytosed nucleic acids (NAs) in endosomal compartments (3). Endosomal localization and intracellular trafficking of these TLRs are strictly regulated to evade recognition of self-RNA/DNA (4), which is also necessary for generation of functional cleaved/associated form of receptors (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). After synthesis, NA-sensing TLRs are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and translocate to the endosomal compartment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation could be that the TLR2 stimulus competes with TLR8 for the use of MyD88. Another explanation refers to the different localizations of TLR8 and TLR2 within the cell: TLR2 is localized mainly in the cell membrane, while TLR8 is localized mainly in the endosome (100,101). This means that free Lpp can immediately activate TLR2 at the host cell surface, while TLR8 activation usually requires bacterial uptake and release of RNA in the host cell.…”
Section: Rna (Tlr7 -8 and -9 Ligand) Acts Antagonistically With Tlrmentioning
confidence: 99%