1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70157-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic ultrasound in restaging of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
67
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Isenberg et al concluded that EUS after CRT was not accurate when using the TNM classification system but found that, if the maximal cross-sectional area was measured and followed, then this proved to be more useful. 19 A response to therapy was defined as a reduction of cross-sectional area by 50%, and this was validated by Chak and colleagues, who also showed a survival benefit for patients who achieved this level of response. 16,18,20 Bowrey et al evaluated a similar group of patients and found the same inaccuracies and unreliability of EUS for restaging esophageal carcinoma after CRT that we found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isenberg et al concluded that EUS after CRT was not accurate when using the TNM classification system but found that, if the maximal cross-sectional area was measured and followed, then this proved to be more useful. 19 A response to therapy was defined as a reduction of cross-sectional area by 50%, and this was validated by Chak and colleagues, who also showed a survival benefit for patients who achieved this level of response. 16,18,20 Bowrey et al evaluated a similar group of patients and found the same inaccuracies and unreliability of EUS for restaging esophageal carcinoma after CRT that we found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUS is unable to reliably determine tumour depth following neoadjuvant treatment [15,16,[18][19][20]. EUS is an invasive procedure with a 20-50% chance of the probe unable to be manoeuvred through the stenotic segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review has shown that EUS and CT have poor sensitivity in identifying disease response in oesophageal carcinoma, 50-100% and 33-55% respectively [21] CT and EUS imaging techniques are often insensitive, relying on changes in tumour bulk which may take considerable time to become apparent. Furthermore, these modalities may have difficulty in distinguishing residual tumour, necrosis, scar tissue and oedema [10,11,15,16,19,20]. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images metabolic activity via the distribution of positron emitting tracers that are incorporated into metabolic processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoskopik ultrasonografi neoadjuvan tedavi sonrası yeniden evrelemede ilk evrelemedeki kadar başarılı (50)(51)(52). Kemotrapi ve radyoterapiye bağlı gelişen inflamasyonu ve fibrozis rezidü tümörden ayırt edilemeyebilir veya rezidü tümör yanlışlıkla olduğundan büyük görülebilir (53).…”
Section: Preoperatif Neoadjuvan Tedaviye Yanıtın Değerlendirilmesiunclassified