2023
DOI: 10.1055/a-2119-7529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy with lumen-apposing metal stents: a retrospective multicentric comparison of wireless and over-the-wire techniques

Abstract: Background Endoscopic ultrasound guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) appears to be effective and safe in gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). However, the EUS-GE procedure is not standardized. The use of assisted or direct methods is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of EUS-GE techniques with focus on assisted with a oro-intestinal drain wireless endoscopic simplified technique (WEST) and the non-assisted direct technique over a guidewire (DTO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only difference was the procedural time, which was significantly longer for the EPASS versus the direct technique (89.9 ± 33.3 vs. 35.7 ± 32.1 min; p < 0.001) [21]. In another recent retrospective multicentric European study [22], the wireless endoscopic simplified technique (WEST) with an orointestinal drain was compared with the nonassisted direct technique over a guidewire (DTOG) in 71 patients (80% with GOO of malignant etiology). Technical success and clinical success rates at 1 month post-procedure were higher in the WEST group (95.1% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.01; 97.5% vs. 89.3%, p = ns.).…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The only difference was the procedural time, which was significantly longer for the EPASS versus the direct technique (89.9 ± 33.3 vs. 35.7 ± 32.1 min; p < 0.001) [21]. In another recent retrospective multicentric European study [22], the wireless endoscopic simplified technique (WEST) with an orointestinal drain was compared with the nonassisted direct technique over a guidewire (DTOG) in 71 patients (80% with GOO of malignant etiology). Technical success and clinical success rates at 1 month post-procedure were higher in the WEST group (95.1% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.01; 97.5% vs. 89.3%, p = ns.).…”
Section: Technical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The first four are the most frequently used [2,9]. Here, we describe the basic steps of each procedure [2,15,16]. The selection of the target site depends on the proximity of the specific segment of the small bowel to the gastric wall, as well as the presence of tumor involvement in the third part of the duodenum.…”
Section: Eus-guided Gastroenterostomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of failure, a surgical conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is performed. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using an oroenteric catheter is a new approach to treat a benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) 4 5 . We report the case of a patient with a gastric twist after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy successfully treated with EUS-GE after failure of repeat endoscopic dilatation.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%