2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06588-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic tympanoplasty type I for tympanic perforations: analysis of prognostic factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the results herein reported should be considered according to the scenario of the study. Studies carried out in university teaching hospitals tend to present poorer results ( Fermi et al., 2021 ). In line with current evidence, the overall results in this study mirror the learning environment and complexity of a tertiary teaching hospital ( Sirena et al., 2010 ; Salvador et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the results herein reported should be considered according to the scenario of the study. Studies carried out in university teaching hospitals tend to present poorer results ( Fermi et al., 2021 ). In line with current evidence, the overall results in this study mirror the learning environment and complexity of a tertiary teaching hospital ( Sirena et al., 2010 ; Salvador et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available field of view for visual recognition may be inadequate for a successful surgery. This is important because the epithelial layer is detached from the inferior part of the TM; additionally, most perforations and postoperative reperforations are found in the anteroinferior quadrant of the TM [ 23 ], and anterior perforation is also considered as a poor prognostic factor for graft uptake because of difficulty in access and graft instability [ 13 , 14 ]. In other words, the cause of the high rate of anterior reperforation is presumably a technical problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohanty et al [ 12 ] reported better graft success rate and ABG closure ratio with use of cartilage graft compared with use of fascial graft. In the study by Fermi et al, [ 13 ] the graft material was found to be the main determinant of the outcomes of endoscopic perforation repair; the use of hard grafts (cartilage or cartilage-perichondrium composite) was found more protective than soft grafts (fascia and perichondrium) alone, with an overall success rate of 91.2%. In a meta-analysis by Tan et al, [ 11 ] use of cartilage increased the closure rate by 2.8% compared with fascia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%