2017
DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy : Success and Failure

Abstract: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has now become an accepted mode of hydrocephalus treatment in children. Varying degrees of success for the procedure have been reported depending on the type and etiology of hydrocephalus, age of the patient and certain technical parameters. Review of these factors for predictability of success, complications and validation of success score is presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of hydrocephalus have rapidly improved over the last century [ 12 ]. From the first attempt to create a permanent ventriculo-subarachnoid-subgaleal CSF diversion by Mikulicz in 1893, to the first functional valve implantation devised by Nulsen and Spitz in 1949, the basis of treatment for hydrocephalus has largely remained the same [ 13 , 14 ]. In spite of several innovations and technical modifications, shunts, which have evolved and matured to become the standard of care for all types of hydrocephalus, are not without complications [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of hydrocephalus have rapidly improved over the last century [ 12 ]. From the first attempt to create a permanent ventriculo-subarachnoid-subgaleal CSF diversion by Mikulicz in 1893, to the first functional valve implantation devised by Nulsen and Spitz in 1949, the basis of treatment for hydrocephalus has largely remained the same [ 13 , 14 ]. In spite of several innovations and technical modifications, shunts, which have evolved and matured to become the standard of care for all types of hydrocephalus, are not without complications [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success of ETV has been determined in many publications as; avoiding a shunt in a patient who would otherwise require one. Most authors would classify ETV as successful if a patient later shows clinical evidence of normal intracranial pressure (ICP) and structural evidence of stable or decreased ventricular size (2, 5, 6, 15, 24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary ETV is an effective, safe and justifiable treatment option for obstructive hydrocephalus due to either shunt malfunction or failure of primary ETV. ETV implementation in such cases carries a strong possibility of further shunt independence or at the least pushes further the need for subsequent intervention [30]. Due to the possibility of late ETV stoma closure, long-term follow-up of these patients is essential.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%