Background/Aims: The learning curve is essential in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training to improve outcomes and reduce the risk of procedure-related complications. We compared the outcomes of gastric ESD in live pigs performed by inexperienced endoscopists with or without <i>ex vivo</i> training.Materials and Methods: At the Olympus Medical Training and Education Center, nine endoscopists inexperienced in ESD were randomly divided into two groups (group A: <i>ex vivo</i> training followed by <i>in vivo</i> training; group B: <i>in vivo</i> training only), and they performed gastric ESDs.Results: A total of 18 ESDs were performed. The <i>en bloc</i> resection rate was 88.9% (16/18), and the complete resection rate was 94.4% (17/18). The median specimen size was 2.5 cm in group A and 2.1 cm in group B (<i>P</i>=0.227). There was no significant difference in the procedure time between the two groups, except for the marking time (0′58″ vs. 2′58″, <i>P</i>=0.027). However, group A took a shorter time in dissecting the same area than group B (109 vs. 246 sec/cm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i>=0.083). Complication rates were not significantly different between both groups.Conclusions: The procedure time during <i>in vivo</i> ESD training in pigs may be shortened by prior <i>ex vivo</i> training. However, the <i>ex vivo</i> model presented poor air inflation, unstable fixation, and excessive mucosal hardness for cutting. An advanced simulator or sufficient <i>ex vivo</i> training may be effective in training for the ESD procedure.