2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Strengths of our study included its relative large size (considering the low incidence of esophageal/cardial SMTs and the study size of other published literatures), relative long period of Follow-up (since 2010), subgroup analysis based on tumor size, and that potential bias was reduced in several ways. Although this was a one-center retrospective study, our therapeutic results were in accordance with the published literatures [4,5,7,8,11,12,17] ); slight difference in complete resection rate, perforation rate, and operation time can be largely explained by limited study size (31 at most [4] ). Time bias did exist as endoscopist had gotten better and better as time went on.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Strengths of our study included its relative large size (considering the low incidence of esophageal/cardial SMTs and the study size of other published literatures), relative long period of Follow-up (since 2010), subgroup analysis based on tumor size, and that potential bias was reduced in several ways. Although this was a one-center retrospective study, our therapeutic results were in accordance with the published literatures [4,5,7,8,11,12,17] ); slight difference in complete resection rate, perforation rate, and operation time can be largely explained by limited study size (31 at most [4] ). Time bias did exist as endoscopist had gotten better and better as time went on.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Endoscopic resection is a first-line treatment for SMTs ≤50 mm in diameter (1,2). Alternative methods include endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and endoscopic full-thickness resection, but these may be associated with unsatisfactory outcomes due to incomplete resection and/or the risk of perforation during the procedure (3)(4)(5). Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has emerged as a novel technique for treating upper gastrointestinal SMTs and has yielded promising results (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, endoscopic surgery does have some drawbacks, such as the risks of incomplete resection, perforation, and bleeding. Several feasibility studies have shown that when used to treat SMTs originating in the MP layer, standard ESD achieves a complete resection in 64% to 75% of cases (Park et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2006;Bialek et al, 2012;Chun et al, 2013;Hobel et al, 2014;Meng et al, 2015) and produces perforation in 0% to 20% of cases (Probst et al, 2009;Jeon et al, 2010;Shi et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2011;Bialek et al, 2012;Hobel et al, 2014). Therefore, when choosing an endoscopic procedure, a preoperative evaluation is important for avoiding both unnecessary surgery and the subsequent procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%