2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00534-011-0408-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic stenting for post‐transplant biliary stricture: usefulness of a novel removable covered metal stent

Abstract: Background Endoscopic management of biliary anastomotic stricture (AS) following liver transplantation (LT) remains challenging. There are no dedicated self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for this setting. Methods A short fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) with a retrieval suture was designed. Between July 2008 and June 2010, 13 patients with post-LT AS had this FCSEMS placed endoscopically, keeping the whole stent inside the bile duct across the AS with the retriever out of the papilla. The stents were removed by fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
49
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies in partially covered stents and fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) for benign biliary strictures including ASs have been positive [Kahaleh et al 2008;Traina et al 2009]. To date there are multiple publications of FCSEMSs in benign biliary strictures (BBSs) and ASs indicating good stricture resolution rates; however, problems such as stent migration have been reported [Hu et al 2011;Park Do et al 2011;Poley et al 2012;Tarantino et al 2012]. Other than stent migration, the key drawback of available FCSEMS is the length of the normal distal bile duct that needs traversing for the stent to cross the stricture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies in partially covered stents and fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) for benign biliary strictures including ASs have been positive [Kahaleh et al 2008;Traina et al 2009]. To date there are multiple publications of FCSEMSs in benign biliary strictures (BBSs) and ASs indicating good stricture resolution rates; however, problems such as stent migration have been reported [Hu et al 2011;Park Do et al 2011;Poley et al 2012;Tarantino et al 2012]. Other than stent migration, the key drawback of available FCSEMS is the length of the normal distal bile duct that needs traversing for the stent to cross the stricture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies of FCSEMS in benign biliary strictures indicating good stricture resolution rates [7][8][9][10]. The FCSEMS offers the advantages of longer stent patency compared with a single plastic stent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Compared with a multiple plastic stents, the potential benefits of a single FCSEMS are in its relative simplicity and the need for only two ERCP procedures, one for insertion and the other for removal. Multiple case series have been published using such stents after liver transplantation, with generally good outcomes [6,8,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 In another study, Kahaleh et al looked at 101 patients with malignant biliary strictures who received partially-covered Wallstents; only 3 cases of stent occlusion were reported at 12 months, and none were due to tumor ingrowth. 21,22 SEMS can have straight ends, flanges, or anchoring flaps. Flanges were introduced to control migration, especially in covered stents.…”
Section: Metal Stentsmentioning
confidence: 99%