2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus plastic stent placement versus stent placement alone for unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
130
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decade, many studies have validated the technical safety and effectiveness of ID-RFA (Table 1). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Most studies used the Habib RFA catheter, and various biliary stents were placed to maintain biliary drainage after ID-RFA. Alis et al 24 reported that endobiliary RFA therapy is feasible and safe for palliative treatment of distal and bismuth type I hilar extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy Of Id-rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the past decade, many studies have validated the technical safety and effectiveness of ID-RFA (Table 1). [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Most studies used the Habib RFA catheter, and various biliary stents were placed to maintain biliary drainage after ID-RFA. Alis et al 24 reported that endobiliary RFA therapy is feasible and safe for palliative treatment of distal and bismuth type I hilar extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy Of Id-rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these conflicting results, additional large-scale randomised studies have recently been conducted. Gao et al 31 compared the efficacy and safety between the RFA + stent group and the stent-only group in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction, such as those with cholangiocarcinoma and ampullary cancer: 174 participants were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio and completed the two scheduled ERCPs with an interval of approximately 3 months. Median overall survival was significantly higher in the RFA group (14.3 vs 9.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.68; P < 0.001).…”
Section: Clinical Efficacy Of Id-rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, endoscopic drainage is associated with a lower complication rate than is surgical decompression. 1 In this issue of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gao et al 2 report a randomized controlled trial on the added value of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in combination with stent placement for malignant extrahepatic obstruction. The authors conclude that additional RFA may improve overall survival and quality of life in patients with inoperable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or ampullary carcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of RFA has been demonstrated in a recent large-scale randomized controlled trial. Gao et al 10 compared the efficacy and safety between the RFA+ stent group and the stent-only group in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction, such as those with cholangiocarcinoma and ampullary cancer; 174 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and completed the two scheduled ERCPs with an interval of approximately 3 months. The median overall survival was significantly higher in the RFA group (14.3 months vs 9.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.68; p<0.001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%