2017
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic navigation system with extended field of view using augmented reality technology

Abstract: The results show that the human subject can perform the task more precisely and safely with the developed AR-based navigation system than with the conventional endoscopic system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[27]. Surgical navigation system prototypes with image fusion on the endoscopic view, have so far not reached TRE values of such low levels [21,22,42,43]. The use of intraoperative CBCT has been suggested as a solution to this problem, as higher registration accuracy on the endoscopic view can be achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[27]. Surgical navigation system prototypes with image fusion on the endoscopic view, have so far not reached TRE values of such low levels [21,22,42,43]. The use of intraoperative CBCT has been suggested as a solution to this problem, as higher registration accuracy on the endoscopic view can be achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a computer-generated image of a pre-planned surgical target, path or risk organ, can be integrated in the endoscope's real-world view. In this way, sub-surface structures can be visualized and a pointer tool is not needed [20][21][22]. AR navigation systems have been successfully applied in several surgical fields, including microsurgery and spine surgery [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 We used a similar approach in our attempt to analyze a diverse oncologic cohort in relationship to newer expanded endoscopic surgery. Recent technological developments in endoscopic procedures 6 and navigational software including augmented, and virtual reality systems [7][8][9] have advanced the field of endoscopic skull base surgery, warranting reevaluation of traditional paradigms with regard to management of skull base malignancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in most studies the set-up required a conventional tracking system (mechanical, optical or electromagnetic). Similarly, in cranial base domain, mutual information, contour-based and point-based registration methods such as ICP have been widely used 10,13,[15][16][17][18] . Clinically, 5-10 minutes registration time has been regarded as acceptable with submillimetric precision 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, anatomical landmarks are difficult to ascertain and track once the procedure starts as they may shift or become obscured from fluids or instruments. Different systems have adopted external tracking systems like optical or electromagnetic trackers to track the motion between the patient and the camera 10,16,20,21 . However, they are expensive and bulky.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%