2004
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Measurement of Barrett’s Esophagus Length is Unreliable - A Prospective Comparative Biopsy Study

Abstract: In the majority of patients, there is only a moderate correlation between the endoscopic and the histological extent of BE. However, we also found a substantial individual variability in endoscopic-histological correlation; therefore studies on the effects of treatment on BE must consider both the endoscopic and histopathological BE lengths.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there have been controversies regarding the reversibility of BE by PPIs 24,25. Amano et al13 reasoned that the difficulty in judging the length of BE26,27 and the diversity of the mucin phenotype contributed to these controversies. In this study, there were no differences in clinical and demographic factors including PPI treatment between the regression and persistence group although the number of patients was small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there have been controversies regarding the reversibility of BE by PPIs 24,25. Amano et al13 reasoned that the difficulty in judging the length of BE26,27 and the diversity of the mucin phenotype contributed to these controversies. In this study, there were no differences in clinical and demographic factors including PPI treatment between the regression and persistence group although the number of patients was small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46][47][48][49][50] Also, C&M criteria for the endoscopic classifi cation of Barrett's esophagus are reliable for LSBE but less reliable for SSBE. 17 However, we have recently shown that the interobserver agreement of endoscopic diagnosis is within a reasonable range for patients with SSBE when the study is performed by the trained and expert endoscopists as in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, despite consistently using the Prague C and M classification, the accuracy of endoscopic measurements of BE length is debated. A German study of 75 BE patients demonstrated that the mean difference between the endoscopic and histological assessment of BE length was ≥1 cm . A Greek study evaluated measurement accuracy of endoscopists using a plastic mannequin and found that accuracies in measuring lengths ≥2 cm and ≥3 cm were 83% and 94–95%, respectively ( P < 0.05) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Greek study evaluated measurement accuracy of endoscopists using a plastic mannequin and found that accuracies in measuring lengths ≥2 cm and ≥3 cm were 83% and 94–95%, respectively ( P < 0.05) . However, a US study validating the Prague C and M classification of BE in clinical practice found that interobserver agreement was 91% for maximum length, 92% for circumferential extent, and 68% for maximum length ≤1 cm, and that BE experts and community hospital endoscopists showed no differences in agreement in length measurements . BE length measurements may vary by 1–2 cm between two endoscopies, which may account for some of the trends seen in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation