2014
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic Management of Early-Stage Chronic Pancreatitis Based on M-ANNHEIM Classification System

Abstract: We demonstrated that a sophisticated M-ANNHEIM classification system for CP will improve diagnosis by allowing for more timely intervention. Furthermore, prompt treatment of CP may achieve improved pain relief and patient outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CP was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and imaging morphologic changes13 and M-ANNHEIM classification system was adopted to define the clinical stage of CP37 (Appendix 1). Stage 1a and 1b (CP patients without pancreatic function insufficiency, with recurrent acute pancreatitis [1a] or chronic abdominal pain [1b]) were defined as early CP and the effectiveness of this definition was proved in previous study with long-term follow-up38. Blood samples from 10 patients with early CP and 9 healthy controls with matched ages and sex were collected for miRNA microarrays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CP was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and imaging morphologic changes13 and M-ANNHEIM classification system was adopted to define the clinical stage of CP37 (Appendix 1). Stage 1a and 1b (CP patients without pancreatic function insufficiency, with recurrent acute pancreatitis [1a] or chronic abdominal pain [1b]) were defined as early CP and the effectiveness of this definition was proved in previous study with long-term follow-up38. Blood samples from 10 patients with early CP and 9 healthy controls with matched ages and sex were collected for miRNA microarrays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a tertiary medical center, Changhai Hospital admitted patients with previous pancreas-related surgical, endoscopic, or other invasive procedures from primary medical centers. In our center, minimally invasive interventions were taken as principle methods prior to surgery: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)/endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for stone removal and main pancreatic duct (MPD) drainage, insertion of stents to treat dominant MPD stricture and biliary duct stricture, and endoscopic drainage for uncomplicated pseudocyst with endoscopic reach 28 35 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 . For CP patients who did not experience pain, interventions were performed only when CP was complicated by CBD stricture, pancreatic portal hypertension, et al ; DM or steatorrhea was not an indication for invasive treatment of CP 13 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this stent exchange policy, sepsis of pancreatic origin was reported in 15 (5.2 %) of 288 patients in four series [66, 68 -69, 72] and surgery was required in two patients for pancreatic abscesses; this was reported in the only series in which no additional investigations at regular intervals were performed [72]. On the other hand, in 12 series (521 patients) with stent exchange scheduled at shorter intervals, usually 3 months, septic complications have not been reported [5,14,65,67,70,73,74,88,90,92,97,98].…”
Section: Pancreatic Stenting: Technical Factors and Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%