Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction: Equinus contracture of the ankle can lead to a multitude of foot and ankle pathologies. The gastrocnemius recession has been used to address equinus deformity via various methods, including either an open or an endoscopic approach. Open techniques require increased intraoperative time and complication risks of sural nerve injury, wound complications, and poor cosmesis. Resultantly, the aim of the current study is to review the complications and outcomes of the endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases was performed. The authors compiled data from retrospective and prospective patient studies including general patient demographics, outcomes, qualitative scoring measures, complications, and surgical technique. Results: Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 697 feet in 627 patients were included in the current systematic review. The weighted mean age was 45.3 years and weighted mean follow-up was 18.4 months. The most common indication for an endoscopic gastrocnemius recession was equinus contracture. The weighted mean preoperative ankle range of motion was −2.3° and the weighted postoperative ankle range of motion was 10.9°. The most common complications included plantarflexion weakness of the ankle at 3.5%, a sural nerve injury of 3.0% and wound complication rate was 1.0% with no deep infection. The overall complication rate was 7.5%. Conclusion: The endoscopic gastrocnemius recession is a valuable surgical tool in the treatment of ankle equinus. The endoscopic approach has satisfactory outcomes including low incidence of plantarflexion weakness and sural neuritis. Patients should be counseled on these risks preoperatively. Compared with previously reported systematic review of the open technique, the endoscopic approach has a lower overall incidence of complications. Prospective clinical trials comparing open and endoscopic techniques are warranted. Levels of Evidence: Level IV
Introduction: Equinus contracture of the ankle can lead to a multitude of foot and ankle pathologies. The gastrocnemius recession has been used to address equinus deformity via various methods, including either an open or an endoscopic approach. Open techniques require increased intraoperative time and complication risks of sural nerve injury, wound complications, and poor cosmesis. Resultantly, the aim of the current study is to review the complications and outcomes of the endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases was performed. The authors compiled data from retrospective and prospective patient studies including general patient demographics, outcomes, qualitative scoring measures, complications, and surgical technique. Results: Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 697 feet in 627 patients were included in the current systematic review. The weighted mean age was 45.3 years and weighted mean follow-up was 18.4 months. The most common indication for an endoscopic gastrocnemius recession was equinus contracture. The weighted mean preoperative ankle range of motion was −2.3° and the weighted postoperative ankle range of motion was 10.9°. The most common complications included plantarflexion weakness of the ankle at 3.5%, a sural nerve injury of 3.0% and wound complication rate was 1.0% with no deep infection. The overall complication rate was 7.5%. Conclusion: The endoscopic gastrocnemius recession is a valuable surgical tool in the treatment of ankle equinus. The endoscopic approach has satisfactory outcomes including low incidence of plantarflexion weakness and sural neuritis. Patients should be counseled on these risks preoperatively. Compared with previously reported systematic review of the open technique, the endoscopic approach has a lower overall incidence of complications. Prospective clinical trials comparing open and endoscopic techniques are warranted. Levels of Evidence: Level IV
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.